Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy
Revision as of 12:00, 2 July 2024 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs)
This is a theory that states "Question Ontology of Scientific Change is a core question of Scientonomy."
Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy:
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | While in Barseghyan's The Laws of Scientific Change, the question of the ontology of scientific change is discussed without being explicitly formulated, it is safe to say that it was tacitly accepted since the inception of the community as one of the questions of scientonomy. | Yes |
Questions Answered
Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy is an attempt to identify a core question of Scientonomy.
Description
The question of what types of epistemic entities, relations, processes, etc. are involved in scientific is one of the central questions of scientonomy.1
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- a b Barseghyan, Hakob. (2018) Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 13-38. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31032.