Modification:Sciento-2018-0011

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable.

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin on 28 December 2018.1 The modification was accepted on 1 September 2019.

Preamble

The traditional distinction between explicit and implicit (or tacit) doesn't do justice to the body of knowledge that hasn't yet been explicitly stated but can - in principle - be openly formulated. Thus, traditionally, tacit knowledge would denote both the knowledge that has not yet been explicated by an epistemic agent as well as knowledge that is in principle inexplicable. To avoid conflation, we need to switch to a three-fold distinction that clearly separates explicable-implicit knowledge from inexplicable knowledge.

Modification

Accept the following three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable:

Explict Implicit Explicable Inexplicable Propositional Nonpropositional (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018).png

Theories To Accept

Questions Answered

This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):

Verdict

The modification was accepted on 1 September 2019. The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Mirkin, Maxim. (2018) The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic. Scientonomy 2, 39-53. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29645.