Test

Hello world

Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018) Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)

Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018) Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015)

Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018) Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018) Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)

The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Scientific Mosaic (Rawleigh-2022)

Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018)

Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Community Can Delegate Authority to Another Community (Loiselle-Overgaard-2016)

Substantive Method (Barseghyan-2015)

The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)

Question Exists

Demarcation Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)

Logical Presupposition Exists

Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015) Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods (Barseghyan-2015)

Social Level (Barseghyan-2015)

Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)

Descriptive Theory Exists

Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Outcome Inconclusive (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Indicators of Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Agent Exists

Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)

Group (Overgaard-2017)

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)

Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018)

Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

One-sided Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Community (Overgaard-2017)

Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)

Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)

Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Normative Theory Exists

Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)

Scope of Scientonomy - Social (Barseghyan-2015)

Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)

Inexplicable (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)

Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018)

Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015)

Compatibility Criteria (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Normative Theory (Sebastien-2016)

Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018)

Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015)

Pursuit as Distinct from Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)

Theory Acceptance Exists

Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Definition Exists

Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)

The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)

Error (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021)

Descriptive Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2015)

Indicators of Method Employment (Barseghyan-2015)

Multiple Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Definition (Barseghyan-2018)

Normative Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Sebastien-2016)

Mosaic Merge (Barseghyan-2015)

Publishing Modification Comments (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)

Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit (Barseghyan-2017)

Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018)

Error Rejection by Replacement (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021)

Method Is a Subtype of Normative Theory (Barseghyan-2018)

Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018)

Definition Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2018) Descriptive Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2015) Normative Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Sebastien-2016)

Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Mosaic Split (Barseghyan-2015)

Method (Barseghyan-2018)

Theory Exists

Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive (Barseghyan-2015)

Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Community Exists

Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Presupposition Exists

Epistemic Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)

Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)

Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)

Accidental Group (Overgaard-2017)

Individual Epistemic Agent Exists

Response to the Argument from Nothing Permanent (Barseghyan-2015)

History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)

Descriptive Theory (Sebastien-2016)

Epistemic Stance Exists

Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)

Allow Modification Reformulations (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)

Response to the Argument from Social Construction (Barseghyan-2015)

Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)

Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018)

Epistemic Element Exists

Singular Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)

Methodology (Barseghyan-2018)

Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Question Can Presuppose Theories (Barseghyan-Levesley-2019) Theory Answers Question (Rawleigh-2018)

The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) is Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Outcome Not Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Method Is a Subtype of Normative Theory (Barseghyan-2018)

Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)

Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)

Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Epistemic Community Exists

Outcome Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015)

Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015)

Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)

Question (Rawleigh-2018)

Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018)

Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)

Handling Ripple Effects - Editorial House Keeping (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)

Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Question Can Presuppose Theories (Barseghyan-Levesley-2019) Theory Answers Question (Rawleigh-2018)

Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)

Question Acceptance Exists

Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016)

Mutual Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015)

Definition Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2018)

Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Non-Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)

Theory (Sebastien-2016)

Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)

The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)

Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit (Barseghyan-2017)

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)

Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)

Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)

Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)

Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)

Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018)

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)

Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018) Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)

Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018) Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015) Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)

Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018) Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018) Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)

The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)

The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)

The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)

Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015)

Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit (Barseghyan-2017)

Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive (Barseghyan-2015)

Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Scope of Scientonomy - Social (Barseghyan-2015)

Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015) Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods (Barseghyan-2015)

Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)

Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)

Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015). It is defined as: "A descriptive discipline that attempts to uncover the actual general mechanism of scientific change."

Welcome to the Encyclopedia of Scientonomy

the clearing house for the scientonomic knowledge on the process of scientific change that aims at

• outlining the current state of our communal knowledge of the mechanism of scientific change;
• tracing all suggested modifications to our communal knowledge;
• documenting the open questions concerning the process of scientific change.

There are currently 3,553 pages in this encyclopedia.

Featured Article Scope of Scientonomy - Construction and Appraisal Ought the process of scientific change be viewed from the perspective of theory construction or that of theory appraisal? In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015) is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question. At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy. Read More In the news 21 February 2024: Modification Sciento-2022-0001 was accepted. Nobody submitted opinions on this modification to the encyclopedia prior to the 2024 workshop. At the workshop, most of the discussion focused around the differences in wording between the earlier definition of scientific mosaic and the new one as formulated by Rawleigh. It was clarified that there is little difference in meaning between the definitions, but Rawleigh’s modification addressed the concern that the old language for describing a scientific mosaic was couched in terms of set theory, which Jamie Shaw pointed out would pose a problem for how we typically talk about mosaics (classifying mosaics by their number of elements is not particularly helpful for scientonomers). The new model-theoretic definition seemed more intuitive to some members of the community, even though neither definition commits to any syntactic view of theories. Some members of the community did not vote on the modification given their lack of experience with set theory, but overall the modification was accepted by over a two-thirds majority of voters. 13 out of 15 votes were to accept. Read More 25 February 2023: Modification Sciento-2019-0007 was accepted. Prior to the 2023 workshop, Ameer Sarwar argued against the modification. First, he noted that voting is not an appropriate mechanism in science where the goal is to unearth truth.c1 Second, it is unclear how we can ensure informed voting given that some members of the community could be inactive for several years. He thus suggested that we should keep this modification open and wait until after the resolution of modifications 2019-0002 and 2019-0003 that suggest alternative ways to increase participation. During the workshop, the modification was generally well received. Before voting, there was some concern about our voting process – who can vote and when can they vote? – voiced by Josh Allen and Paul Patton. Additionally, Deivide Garcia and Amirali Atrli raised concerns about who are “allowed” to function as part of the scientonomy community. Patton also suggested introducing quorum in addition to the 2/3rds stipulation to avoid potential modifications to the scientonomic body of knowledge introduced by a small number of participants. Gregory Rupik along with Jamie Shaw indicated that while quorum makes perfect sense for larger decision-making bodies, our capacity to vote should not hinge on who is absent, but rather on who is present. It was also determined that even though there is always a risk of a small group of people making big changes, or with people being unsatisfied with a modification they were not allowed to vote on, the iterative nature of our process ensures that there are easy solutions here; in addition, as Spenser summarized, most people in academic environments can be trusted to self-police. Rupik also highlighted the need to formalize the acceptance mechanism in the encyclopedia explicitly: i.e. without 3 comments with unanimity, the modification will be discussed at a workshop, and it is possible that it will remain open after the workshop, in which case we will wait until the next workshop to further discuss and modify it. Notably, since this proposal represents an attempt to formalize a voting system and closure mechanism, and itself was not subject to a specific voting system, it was decided by those present that we would accept this modification with a minimum of 2/3rds assent. The modification was accepted with overwhelming support. Read More 25 February 2023: Modification Sciento-2019-0006 was accepted. The decision was made during the 2023 workshop. Hakob Barseghyan emphasized that this modification does not grant permission to alter the body of scientonomic knowledge but simply to ensure that the pages of the encyclopedia reflect the actual state of scientonomic knowledge and that the scientonomic knowledge is stored in the most appropriate manner. Among other things, this is to handle the so-called ripple effect. Barseghyan mentioned that, while working on the encyclopedia with Paul Patton and Izzy Friesen, they had discovered several instances of ripple effect that resulted from our human lack of omniscience (e.g. a theory was supposed to be listed under Theories to Accept of a modification but wasn’t; a theory was actually accepted by the community but there was no record of it in the encyclopedia, etc.). Hence, according to Barseghyan, it would make sense to grant the editors the necessary right to adjust the respective pages to handle its consequences. Deivide Garcia wondered how such very small modifications can be tracked. Barseghyan responded that the changes in question are not meant to concern the body of scientonomic knowledge (thus, these are not modifications in the standard scientonomic sense), but are only to ensure that the encyclopedia reflects the current state of scientonomic knowledge and organizes that knowledge efficiently. Kye Palider highlighted the issue of transparency: how will the community be notified about such changes? Barseghyan suggested that an annual housekeeping paper is to be published in the Scientonomy journal as a collective report on changes to the encyclopedia. The modification was accepted. Read More

Recent Suggested Modifications (all) Sciento-2024-0003: Open Sanghoon Oh Accept that element decay is a non-scientonomic phenomenon. The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending. Read More Sciento-2024-0002: Open Sanghoon Oh Accept a list of necessary indicators of theory decay. The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending. Read More Sciento-2024-0001: Open Sanghoon Oh Accept that the phenomenon of element decay exists. The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending. Read More Recent Publications (check out the journal) Discipline Dynamics of Chymistry and Rejection of Alchemy Paul Patton and Izzy Friesen Abstract: This paper applies Patton and Al-Zayadi’s scientonomic framework for understanding disciplines to a case study of the development of the chemical discipline ("chymistry") from the 17th century through the early 18th century in Western Europe. Using evidence from the tradition of textbook publication that emerged in the seventeenth-century chymistry, we reconstruct the top-level of the question hierarchy of chymistry. Analyzing how these questions and their associated theories were received, we first show how, starting in the 1660s, alchemy transitioned from a synonym of chymistry to chymistry’s subdiscipline with a more limited scope. We identify that the rejection of alchemy's core questions occurred in the 1720s based on the reception of these questions in scientific publications and by academic institutions. Hence, we conclude that the subdiscipline of alchemy became rejected in the 1720s. In order to conduct our case-study, we closely follow Newman and Principe's research on early modern alchemy and chymistry in our reconstruction of the episode. However, using the scientonomic framework in analyzing this case study reveals the specific dynamics of this instance of sub-discipline rejection. Our deepened understanding of this hallmark historical episode of disciplinary rejection indicates the value of Patton and Al-Zayadi’s theoretical framework for observational scientonomic research. Read More Epistemic Actions: A Scientonomic Framework Joshua Allen Abstract: In a series of publications, Hasok Chang makes the case that activities carried out by epistemic agents form the basis of the scientific enterprise. This paper provides an action-based scientonomic perspective of scientific practice. I define epistemic action as an action of an epistemic agent that involves an epistemic element and highlight the difference between global and local actions. The availability of a local action to an epistemic agent amounts to the agent employing the norm that the local action is permissible/desirable. To unearth the mechanism by which local actions become available to epistemic agents, I derive the local action availability theorem, according to which, a local epistemic action becomes available to an agent only when its permissibility is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the agent’s mosaic, i.e., from that agent’s employed norms and accepted theories. This framework is then applied to the emergence of the local action of determining the composition of chemical substances by weighing as practiced by Lavoisier and his followers; it is shown that the respective norm became employed in accord with the local action availability theorem. Read More Corpus Linguistics Strategies for Identifying Accepted Theories in Early Modern England G. G. Shan Abstract: The paper investigates the applicability of corpus linguistics to the construction of a database of intellectual history. Working with the Royal Society Corpus (RSC), it presents a series of corpus queries that can aid with computationally identifying potential instances of communal theory acceptance in England during the period of 1665-1800. These queries allowed to identify a set of noun-adjective pairs potentially synonymous with “accepted theory” and retrieve around 1,400 excerpts potentially indicative of instances of communal theory acceptance. The paper also discusses some strategies for identifying the epistemic agent, as well as the RSC’s place within the broader historical context. Finally, I argue that, in addition to exploring corpus linguistics strategies, methodologies for interpreting computationally retrieved data should also be developed. Read More

From today's featured list Some text