Search results

Create the page "Necessary Elements" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• Epistemic Agent Exists
  ...f the process of scientific change, as they take stances towards epistemic elements.
  816 bytes (105 words) - 15:50, 9 February 2023
• Mechanism of Compatibility
  |Question=Under what conditions can two elements ''coexist'' in the same mosaic? ...rseghyan (2015)|pp. 159-161]] What conditions allow for the coexistence of elements, and what conditions require modification or rejection to take place?
  5 KB (686 words) - 20:39, 26 February 2023
• The Status of Holism and Ripple Effect
  |Question=Is it the case that changes in one of the elements of a mosaic can have a "ripple effect" on the rest of the mosaic? ...tion=As an element of a mosaic undergoes modification, it seems that other elements that are dependent on this element can also undergo change. For instance, t
  2 KB (353 words) - 01:33, 3 September 2019
• Individual Epistemic Agent Exists
  ...Epistemic Stance|epistemic stances]] towards [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]].[[CiteRef::Patton (2019)]]
  951 bytes (118 words) - 17:03, 9 February 2023
• Mechanism of Method Rejection
  ...eir employed method. This question seeks to describe what happens to other elements in the mosaic when a community undergoes such a change.
  1,000 bytes (135 words) - 20:46, 26 February 2023
• Applicability of the Laws of Scientific Change to Individuals
  ...s, i.e. changes in stances that epistemic agents take towards to epistemic elements. The question is whether these laws apply to changes in belief systems of '
  869 bytes (120 words) - 21:32, 1 February 2020
• Theory Answers Question (Rawleigh-2018)
  ...tance of [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0002|Rawleigh's ontology of epistemic elements]].
  979 bytes (119 words) - 16:01, 28 December 2022
• Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
  ...it must be clarified which types of stances can be taken towards epistemic elements of any given type. ...'' types; the stances that can be taken toward specific types of epistemic elements (e.g. towards [[Theory|theories]], [[Question|questions]], [[Method|methods
  5 KB (671 words) - 17:12, 27 February 2023
• Epistemic Stances Towards Theories
  |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements ...not'' include the more general stances that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types, but only those that can be taken towards theories.
  3 KB (437 words) - 20:19, 23 January 2023
• Method (Barseghyan-2018)
  ...implicit, and thus merge what was previously separated into two classes of elements - [[Method (Barseghyan-2015)|methods]] and [[Methodology (Sebastien-2016)|m
  1 KB (132 words) - 00:12, 3 September 2019
• Existence of Model
  ...synonyms. In the scientonomic context, theories are considered fundamental elements of a mosaic. This leaves the question of the status of models in a mosaic.
  1 KB (157 words) - 16:21, 21 February 2023
• Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
  ...the end of the 17th century many of its key elements were replaced by new elements. Finally, by circa 1700 the Aristotelian-medieval system of theories was re
  3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
• Ontology of Scientific Change
  ...ts'', taking different epistemic ''stances'' towards different epistemic ''elements''. For instance, we can say that the Paris community of 1720 [[Theory Accep * What types of [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]] can there be in the process of scientific change? I.e. are there theories
  8 KB (1,169 words) - 11:25, 13 February 2024
• Scope of Scientonomy - Tracing Implicit and Explicit
  ...rested in both explicit and implicit elements and stances, is it important/necessary to trace this difference? What are the practical considerations for and aga
  1 KB (149 words) - 21:31, 16 October 2022
• Scientific Mosaic
  ...e fixed. The idea that methods should be included as historically relative elements within a community’s system of beliefs is known as [[Static and Dynamic M ...Barseghyan-2015)|methods]] are the only two fundamental types of epistemic elements.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]][[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]]
  6 KB (884 words) - 17:35, 1 June 2024
• Reducibility of Definitions
  |Question=Are [[Definition|definitions]] somehow reducible to other epistemic elements, such as [[Descriptive Theory|descriptive]] or [[Normative Theory|normative
  1 KB (144 words) - 16:36, 21 February 2023
• Necessary Theories
  |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
  1 KB (160 words) - 15:43, 23 January 2023
• Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
  |Conclusion=Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Title=Deduction of the Necessary Mosaic Split Theorem
  1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
• Fraser and Sarwar (2018)
  ...mpatibility'' is an independent stance that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types. We then provide a new definition of ''compatibility criteria'
  1 KB (190 words) - 03:29, 22 March 2019
• Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
  ...tibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)|the compatibility corollary]], the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other at any moment of ti
  1 KB (145 words) - 11:05, 17 January 2024

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)