Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...synonyms. In the scientonomic context, theories are considered fundamental elements of a mosaic. This leaves the question of the status of models in a mosaic.
    1 KB (157 words) - 16:21, 21 February 2023
  • ...the end of the 17th century many of its key elements were replaced by new elements. Finally, by circa 1700 the Aristotelian-medieval system of theories was re
    3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
  • ...rested in both explicit and implicit elements and stances, is it important/necessary to trace this difference? What are the practical considerations for and aga
    1 KB (149 words) - 21:31, 16 October 2022
  • ...e fixed. The idea that methods should be included as historically relative elements within a community’s system of beliefs is known as [[Static and Dynamic M ...Barseghyan-2015)|methods]] are the only two fundamental types of epistemic elements.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]][[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]]
    6 KB (884 words) - 17:35, 1 June 2024
  • |Question=Are [[Definition|definitions]] somehow reducible to other epistemic elements, such as [[Descriptive Theory|descriptive]] or [[Normative Theory|normative
    1 KB (144 words) - 16:36, 21 February 2023
  • ...ts'', taking different epistemic ''stances'' towards different epistemic ''elements''. For instance, we can say that the Paris community of 1720 [[Theory Accep * What types of [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]] can there be in the process of scientific change? I.e. are there theories
    9 KB (1,261 words) - 07:04, 23 June 2024
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    1 KB (160 words) - 15:43, 23 January 2023
  • |Conclusion=Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Title=Deduction of the Necessary Mosaic Split Theorem
    1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
  • ...mpatibility'' is an independent stance that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types. We then provide a new definition of ''compatibility criteria'
    1 KB (190 words) - 03:29, 22 March 2019
  • ...tibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)|the compatibility corollary]], the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other at any moment of ti
    1 KB (145 words) - 11:05, 17 January 2024
  • ...tibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)|the compatibility corollary]], the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other at any moment of ti
    1 KB (149 words) - 10:49, 17 January 2024
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    1 KB (200 words) - 20:02, 10 February 2023
  • ...ics [...] Therefore, in order for the two mosaics to merge into one, these elements should either be rejected in both or accepted in both, so that the differen
    5 KB (737 words) - 22:07, 10 November 2023
  • ...nvolved. Additionally, there is a distinct lack of historical evidence for necessary mosaic splits. |Lower Order Elements=
    1 KB (183 words) - 13:59, 29 December 2022
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (210 words) - 20:32, 23 January 2023
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (215 words) - 20:55, 10 February 2023
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    1 KB (190 words) - 17:15, 22 January 2023
  • ...s conception of meaning onto Popper's falsificationist philosophy. The key elements of Feyerabend's model of the acquisition of knowledge are identified and cr
    1 KB (188 words) - 02:36, 29 August 2017
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (215 words) - 16:40, 21 February 2023
  • |Inherited From=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements
    1 KB (186 words) - 12:17, 20 June 2024

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)