Difference between revisions of "Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)"
(Created page with "{{Theory |Title=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance/Unacceptance of a Single Contender |Theory Type=Descriptive |Formulation Text=There is a series of inferen...") |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theory | {{Theory | ||
− | |Title=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance | + | |Title=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of a Single Contender |
|Theory Type=Descriptive | |Theory Type=Descriptive | ||
+ | |Alternate Titles= | ||
|Formulation Text=There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender. | |Formulation Text=There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender. | ||
|Formulation File=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png | |Formulation File=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png | ||
|Topic=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes | |Topic=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes | ||
− | |Authors List= | + | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton |
|Formulated Year=2017 | |Formulated Year=2017 | ||
|Description=The following inferences can be drawn regarding theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender theory: | |Description=The following inferences can be drawn regarding theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender theory: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Resource=Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017) | |Resource=Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017) | ||
+ | |Prehistory= | ||
+ | |History= | ||
+ | |Page Status=Needs Editing | ||
+ | |Editor Notes= | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:40, 31 May 2020
This is an answer to the question Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes that states "There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender."
Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of a Single Contender was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan and Paul Patton in 2017.1
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Suggestions To Accept
Here are all the modifications where the acceptance of this theory has been suggested:
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2017-0006 | Scientonomy | 5 February 2017 | Accept the following set of inferences of theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender and two contenders. | Open |
Question Answered
Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is an attempt to answer the following question: What can an observational scientonomist infer about a theory's assessment outcome from the theory's acceptance/unacceptance?
See Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes for more details.
Description
The following inferences can be drawn regarding theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender theory:
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Patton, Paul; Overgaard, Nicholas and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2017) Reformulating the Second Law. Scientonomy 1, 29-39. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27158.