Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2018-0014"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Date Suggested Day=28 | |Date Suggested Day=28 | ||
|Date Suggested Approximate=No | |Date Suggested Approximate=No | ||
| − | |Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser | + | |Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser |
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018) | |Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018) | ||
|Preamble=Since the stance of scientificity can be taken towards theories, it is important for theoretical scientonomy to explain how this stances changes through time. The ''law of theory demarcation'' that we suggest here is meant to provide such an explanation. The law states that the scientificty of a theory depends crucially on the employed ''criteria of demarcation''. In particular, if a theory conclusively satisfies the demarcation criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes scientific; if it conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria, remains unscientific, and if assessment is inconclusive, the theory’s status can become scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Given that conclusive satisfaction of the demarcation criteria precludes unscientific and uncertain status and conclusive failure to satisfy it preclude scientific and unscientific status of the theory, the ''law of theory demarcation'' is non-tautological. | |Preamble=Since the stance of scientificity can be taken towards theories, it is important for theoretical scientonomy to explain how this stances changes through time. The ''law of theory demarcation'' that we suggest here is meant to provide such an explanation. The law states that the scientificty of a theory depends crucially on the employed ''criteria of demarcation''. In particular, if a theory conclusively satisfies the demarcation criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes scientific; if it conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria, remains unscientific, and if assessment is inconclusive, the theory’s status can become scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Given that conclusive satisfaction of the demarcation criteria precludes unscientific and uncertain status and conclusive failure to satisfy it preclude scientific and unscientific status of the theory, the ''law of theory demarcation'' is non-tautological. | ||
| − | |To Accept=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018), The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) | + | |Modification= |
| − | |To Accept Questions=Indicators of | + | |To Accept=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018), The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |
| + | |To Accept Questions=Indicators of Conclusiveness for Scientificity Assessment, Indicators of Theory Scientificity | ||
|Automatic=No | |Automatic=No | ||
|Verdict=Open | |Verdict=Open | ||
| + | |{{{field|Date Assessed Year|input type=regexp|regexp=/^\d{4}$/|size=4|message=The year field can accept only integers and must be 4 digits in length!|mandatory= | ||
| + | |Date Assessed Month= | ||
| + | |Date Assessed Day= | ||
|Date Assessed Approximate=No | |Date Assessed Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Verdict Rationale= | ||
| + | |Superseded By= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:00, 31 May 2020
{{Modification |Community=Community:Scientonomy |Acronym=Sciento |Summary=Accept the law of theory demarcation as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions concerning indicators of scientificity as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry. |Date Suggested Year=2018 |Date Suggested Month=December |Date Suggested Day=28 |Date Suggested Approximate=No |Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser |Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018) |Preamble=Since the stance of scientificity can be taken towards theories, it is important for theoretical scientonomy to explain how this stances changes through time. The law of theory demarcation that we suggest here is meant to provide such an explanation. The law states that the scientificty of a theory depends crucially on the employed criteria of demarcation. In particular, if a theory conclusively satisfies the demarcation criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes scientific; if it conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria, remains unscientific, and if assessment is inconclusive, the theory’s status can become scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Given that conclusive satisfaction of the demarcation criteria precludes unscientific and uncertain status and conclusive failure to satisfy it preclude scientific and unscientific status of the theory, the law of theory demarcation is non-tautological. |Modification= |To Accept=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018), The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |To Accept Questions=Indicators of Conclusiveness for Scientificity Assessment, Indicators of Theory Scientificity |Automatic=No |Verdict=Open |{Template:Field
References
- ^ Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.
