Difference between revisions of "Normative Effects of Scientonomy"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
|Description=How can our accepted scientonomic theories influence the very process they are meant to describe? Specifically, can an acceptance of scientonomy and its becoming part of broad university curricula affect the way scientists do science? If so, wouldn't this be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy, when scientists start acting in accord with the laws of scientonomy even if they weren't doing so prior to learning the laws of scientific change? | |Description=How can our accepted scientonomic theories influence the very process they are meant to describe? Specifically, can an acceptance of scientonomy and its becoming part of broad university curricula affect the way scientists do science? If so, wouldn't this be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy, when scientists start acting in accord with the laws of scientonomy even if they weren't doing so prior to learning the laws of scientific change? | ||
| − | |Authors List=Ameer Sarwar | + | |Parent Topic= |
| + | |Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Hakob Barseghyan, Sinan Karamehmetoglu | ||
|Formulated Year=2018 | |Formulated Year=2018 | ||
| − | |Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018 | + | |Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018 |
| − | |Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative | + | |Prehistory= |
| + | |History= | ||
| + | |Current View= | ||
| + | |Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
| + | |Editor Notes=Why normative in the title? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record | ||
| Line 18: | Line 23: | ||
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]]. | |Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]]. | ||
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Era= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day= | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:26, 16 October 2022
What are the normative effects of scientonomy on the process of scientific change?
How can our accepted scientonomic theories influence the very process they are meant to describe? Specifically, can an acceptance of scientonomy and its becoming part of broad university curricula affect the way scientists do science? If so, wouldn't this be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy, when scientists start acting in accord with the laws of scientonomy even if they weren't doing so prior to learning the laws of scientific change?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan, Sinan Karamehmetoglu and Ameer Sarwar in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 18 January 2018 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018. | Yes |
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
