Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Abstract" with value "Although we accept that a scientific mosaic is a set of theories and methods accepted and employed by a scientific community, ''scientific community'' currently lacks a proper definition in scientonomy. In this paper, I will outline a basic taxonomy for the bearers of a mosaic, i.e. the social agents of scientific change. I begin by differentiating between ''accidental group'' and ''community'' through the respective absence and presence of a collective intentionality. I then identify two subtypes of community: the ''epistemic community'' that has a collective intentionality to know the world, and the ''non-epistemic community'' that does not have such a collective intentionality. I note that both epistemic and non-epistemic communities might bear mosaics, but that epistemic communities are the intended social agents of scientific change because their main collective intentionality is to know the world and, in effect, to change their mosaics. I conclude my paper by arguing we are not currently in a position to properly define ''scientific community'' per se because of the risk of confusing ''pseudoscientific communities'' with scientific communities. However, I propose that we can for now rely on the definition of epistemic community as the proper social agent of scientific change.". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 2 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

    • Overgaard (2017)  + (Although we accept that a scientific mosaiAlthough we accept that a scientific mosaic is a set of theories and methods accepted and employed by a scientific community, ''scientific community'' currently lacks a proper definition in scientonomy. In this paper, I will outline a basic taxonomy for the bearers of a mosaic, i.e. the social agents of scientific change. I begin by differentiating between ''accidental group'' and ''community'' through the respective absence and presence of a collective intentionality. I then identify two subtypes of community: the ''epistemic community'' that has a collective intentionality to know the world, and the ''non-epistemic community'' that does not have such a collective intentionality. I note that both epistemic and non-epistemic communities might bear mosaics, but that epistemic communities are the intended social agents of scientific change because their main collective intentionality is to know the world and, in effect, to change their mosaics. I conclude my paper by arguing we are not currently in a position to properly define ''scientific community'' per se because of the risk of confusing ''pseudoscientific communities'' with scientific communities. However, I propose that we can for now rely on the definition of epistemic community as the proper social agent of scientific change. proper social agent of scientific change.)