Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Theory of Scientific Change" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ...ry of Scientific Change proposed by Barseghyan in 2015 is a set consisting of the following claims: * [[Theory (Barseghyan-2015)]]3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
Page text matches
- {{Theory |Topic=History of Scientific Change1 KB (186 words) - 16:14, 16 February 2017
- |Question=What is '''scientific change'''? How should it be ''defined''? ...cientific study of scientific change. Thus, defining the term ''scientific change'' is an important task.1 KB (163 words) - 22:53, 11 December 2022
- |Title=The Laws of Scientific Change |Cover Image=Barseghyan.H The.Laws.of.Scientific.Change.2015.png2 KB (232 words) - 00:54, 3 June 2020
- {{Theory |Title=Possibility of Scientonomy738 bytes (93 words) - 22:38, 19 February 2023
- |Question=Under what circumstances does scientific change become impossible? ...scientific change seeks to identify how such changes are possible. Such a theory must identify and describe which factors allow a community to modify any el1 KB (144 words) - 16:55, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition730 bytes (93 words) - 16:14, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive838 bytes (115 words) - 15:51, 30 March 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Underdetermined Theory Change theorum2 KB (213 words) - 14:40, 28 September 2016
- {{Theory |Topic=Scientific Change2 KB (250 words) - 20:54, 3 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition729 bytes (97 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Topic=Theory Use730 bytes (101 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields1 KB (195 words) - 16:00, 4 July 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Social2 KB (273 words) - 16:11, 6 July 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method927 bytes (125 words) - 01:14, 6 December 2018
- {{Theory |Title=Underdetermined Method Change theorem1 KB (186 words) - 15:49, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive2 KB (252 words) - 18:46, 23 November 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition711 bytes (91 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition871 bytes (110 words) - 14:17, 31 May 2020
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods1 KB (185 words) - 16:02, 4 July 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit2 KB (219 words) - 14:29, 7 July 2017
- |Title=Thinking Big: The Science of Change and the Historicity of Scientific Method ...y of scientific change, evolutionary epistemology, and a general theory of change is investigated.2 KB (278 words) - 22:20, 24 December 2021
- ...in one of the elements of a mosaic can have a "ripple effect" on the rest of the mosaic? ...ripple" changes exhibit the same patterns as other instances of scientific change?2 KB (353 words) - 01:33, 3 September 2019
- |Title=The Relative A Priori as a Model of Radical Conceptual Change in Science ...ibed as empirical. I present evidence to show that the model of scientific change can be applied widely.1 KB (200 words) - 22:28, 24 December 2021
- ...stion is how ''demarcation criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. ...d, Scientific Change, Theory, Mechanism of Scientific Change, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Compatibility Criteria,918 bytes (122 words) - 19:58, 11 December 2022
- {{Theory |Title=Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts3 KB (411 words) - 18:52, 25 July 2017
- ...ion is how ''compatibility criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. ...m of Theory Acceptance, Theory, Mechanism of Scientific Change, Scientific Change, Demarcation Criteria, Acceptance Criteria,943 bytes (124 words) - 19:51, 11 December 2022
- |Title=The fourth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change ...fourth seminar on the theory of scientific change at the IHPST, University of Toronto.520 bytes (73 words) - 00:04, 8 March 2018
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Theory773 bytes (98 words) - 04:30, 19 January 2023
- ...estion is how ''acceptance criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. ...Scientific Change, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Mechanism of Scientific Change,1 KB (142 words) - 19:40, 11 December 2022
- {{Theory |Topic=Theory Acceptance1,002 bytes (133 words) - 04:04, 16 February 2017
- |Title=Scientonomy: The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change ...ested in reviving the project of understanding the mechanism of scientific change while respecting the diversity and complexity that has been unveiled by car2 KB (359 words) - 05:31, 3 December 2021
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition961 bytes (120 words) - 23:57, 15 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (158 words) - 19:51, 23 January 2023
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales2 KB (240 words) - 15:59, 4 July 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (160 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- |Title=The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change ...erating a paradox and that neither the third nor zeroth laws of scientific change need be violated. I outline my solution to the paradox and conclude by desc2 KB (282 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
- ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. |Related Topics=Scientific Change, Mosaic Split, Theory of Scientific Change,591 bytes (80 words) - 22:05, 11 December 2022
- ...ry of Scientific Change proposed by Barseghyan in 2015 is a set consisting of the following claims: * [[Theory (Barseghyan-2015)]]3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
- ...ion=Do ''definitions'' play any distinct role in the process of scientific change, or do they only exhibit the exact same patterns as descriptive and normati ...s of scientific change. Philosophical and historical studies of conceptual change suggest a complex underlying dynamics.[[CiteRef::Chi (1992)]][[CiteRef::Chi707 bytes (97 words) - 19:35, 7 October 2018
- ...take towards a theory? Which stances towards a theory ought a scientonomic theory account for? ...ught it also account for scientists decisions to pursue theories as worthy of further development, or their decisions to treat theories as instrumentally3 KB (429 words) - 17:21, 20 October 2022
- ...s the theory of scientific change applicable to theories construed as sets of models, or in ways that reject their purely formal characterization? ...y of scientific change compatible with these more recent and broader views of theories?2 KB (268 words) - 22:51, 9 July 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (143 words) - 13:45, 5 December 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (165 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Scientific Mosaic2 KB (270 words) - 20:37, 3 February 2023
- ...t of an assessment of a theory by a method? What is the complete list of ''theory assessment outcomes''? ...outcome obtains. The question here is what outcomes can possibly obtain in theory assessment?1 KB (172 words) - 17:39, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal3 KB (497 words) - 16:04, 4 July 2017
- |Question=What is '''history of scientific change?''' How should it be ''defined?'' ...chanism of Method Employment, Mechanism of Scientific Change, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance702 bytes (88 words) - 21:33, 11 December 2022
- |Title=Episodic Rationality in Scientific Change ...y which is contextually localized, but still presents a clear direction of scientific development at every individual time step.2 KB (255 words) - 22:19, 24 December 2021
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (172 words) - 13:08, 13 September 2019
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (180 words) - 18:07, 29 November 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance2 KB (345 words) - 16:54, 11 January 2018
- |Question=How do theories become ''scientific'' or ''unscientific''? ...n. These are the two processes via which an unscientific theory may become scientific.2 KB (344 words) - 05:23, 3 March 2019
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Mosaic Split1 KB (165 words) - 20:46, 6 November 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (186 words) - 18:07, 29 November 2017
- ...happens to other elements in the mosaic when a community undergoes such a change. |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change1,000 bytes (135 words) - 20:46, 26 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (183 words) - 18:06, 29 November 2017
- {{Theory |Topic=Changeability of the Scientific Mosaic3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
- ...ancial constraints or limitations of manpower in the process of scientific change? ...aspect of sociocultural factors affecting the process of theory and method change?1 KB (165 words) - 19:01, 21 March 2017
- |Question=What method ''ought'' to be employed to assess a ''scientonomic theory''? ...for the process of scientific change and the transitions from one accepted theory to another and one employed method to another, [[CiteRef:: Barseghyan (20152 KB (225 words) - 18:53, 15 February 2018
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive4 KB (641 words) - 21:46, 19 February 2023
- |Title=The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change ...is in line with the growing interest in Integrated History and Philosophy of Science, Social Epistemology, and Cognitive Historiography.4 KB (586 words) - 19:06, 24 December 2021
- {{Theory |Topic=Theory2 KB (334 words) - 20:05, 3 February 2023
- {{Theory |Title=Theory Assessment Outcomes2 KB (265 words) - 18:05, 29 November 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive5 KB (687 words) - 07:15, 7 December 2018
- |Singular Capitalized=Theory Acceptance |Plural Capitalized=Instances of Theory Acceptance2 KB (255 words) - 14:17, 16 January 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition2 KB (211 words) - 19:59, 3 February 2023
- ...best studied in a piecemeal theory-guided fashion. It is an integral part of [[Scientonomic Workflow|the scientonomic workflow]]. ...rrent Mosaic|currently accepted theory]] to historical cases of scientific change;2 KB (242 words) - 01:39, 8 December 2018
- ...tural factors, such as economics or politics, in the process of scientific change? ...of Scientific Change, or they occur in violation of the Laws of Scientific Change.6 KB (959 words) - 05:01, 11 January 2018
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
- ...How Can a Taxonomy of Stances Help Clarify Classical Debates on Scientific Change? ...lly, we outline a few general lessons concerning the process of scientific change.1 KB (200 words) - 16:13, 12 November 2017
- {{Inheritance Theory |Parent=Theory2 KB (198 words) - 00:33, 11 February 2023
- |Title=Feyerabend’s General Theory of Scientific Change354 bytes (42 words) - 17:25, 15 February 2021
- ...ntology'' of epistemic elements that are part of the process of scientific change. ...heories that become accepted and rejected during the process of scientific change. [[CiteRef::Popper (1959)]]7 KB (1,005 words) - 22:02, 27 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (205 words) - 18:03, 29 November 2017
- ...f ''sociocultural factors'', such as economics or politics, in the process of ''method employment''? ...the Laws of Scientific Change, when it is permitted by the employed method of that mosaic.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 239]]4 KB (600 words) - 05:02, 11 January 2018
- ...on=How do theories within a discipline shape and change the core questions of the disciplines? ...estion of how theories within a discipline shape and change core questions of the discipline is an interesting topic for further research.1 KB (181 words) - 22:44, 3 August 2021
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive5 KB (710 words) - 00:14, 5 December 2018
- |Question=How can scientonomy be possible if there are no permanent features of science? ...(Conclusion) Particularism: There can be no general theory of scientific change.5 KB (753 words) - 20:55, 5 December 2018
- ...d''? What kinds of facts ought to be relevant for assessing a scientonomic theory? ...have confirmed novel predictions to become accepted. Should a scientonomic theory be assessed by its ability to make novel predictions? Alternatively, should3 KB (442 words) - 17:47, 22 January 2023
- ...e relationship between reasons and scientific change? Is it possible for a theory to remain accepted while the original reason for its acceptance is replaced ...sons theories? Are reasons theories about theories? Are they components of scientific mosaics?1 KB (217 words) - 14:13, 29 December 2022
- |Title=The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change ...owledge is intrinsically intertwined with scientific knowledge as accepted scientific and technological theories often jointly shape employed methods.2 KB (237 words) - 13:55, 4 January 2019
- ...be accepted by a community, then how can methods be deductive consequences of accepted theories, given that historically employed methods and accepted me ...s and employed methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But, that seems to be clearly not t4 KB (625 words) - 05:53, 11 January 2018
- |Title=The first annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change257 bytes (36 words) - 19:54, 4 November 2016
- |Title=Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change ...rms, can be both ''accepted and employed''. Finally, a new definition of ''scientific mosaic'' is suggested to fit the new ontology.2 KB (243 words) - 21:30, 2 June 2020
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Normative Theory894 bytes (114 words) - 19:49, 10 February 2023
- ..., since science is a social construct, then a general theory of scientific change cannot exist. ...s it raised for the possibility of crafting a general theory of scientific change were clarified.7 KB (1,015 words) - 14:52, 17 July 2016
- |Title=The second annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change304 bytes (41 words) - 17:57, 22 September 2020
- ...hyan (2015)|p. 239]]. In the scientonomic context, a general of scientific change is not possible if science is a social construct [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (201 |Parent Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy6 KB (863 words) - 00:04, 5 December 2018
- {{Theory |Title=Scientific Underdeterminism theorem7 KB (1,073 words) - 21:37, 11 March 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition2 KB (244 words) - 14:37, 12 June 2020
- |Title=The third annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change343 bytes (47 words) - 17:58, 22 September 2020
- ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. ...y evidences that suggest that a scientific community is the reason for the change in the science’ methods and theories.4 KB (545 words) - 23:19, 11 December 2022
- |Title=Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation ...be traced and explained by scientonomy. Thus, we formulate a new ''law of theory demarcation'' to account for changes in scientificity within the scientonom1 KB (157 words) - 22:31, 23 February 2019
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Epistemic Community1 KB (159 words) - 17:24, 9 February 2023
- |Question=What is '''scientific mosaic'''? How should it be ''defined''? ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance.6 KB (799 words) - 19:20, 10 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive4 KB (562 words) - 22:15, 10 November 2023
- |Title=The eight annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change363 bytes (49 words) - 15:39, 1 October 2020
- -->|?Theory<!-- -->|?Theory<!--4 KB (468 words) - 08:19, 11 February 2024
- |Title=The sixth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change385 bytes (50 words) - 21:20, 11 February 2018
