Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Theory of Scientific Change" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ...ry of Scientific Change proposed by Barseghyan in 2015 is a set consisting of the following claims: * [[Theory (Barseghyan-2015)]]3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
Page text matches
- {{Theory |Topic=History of Scientific Change1 KB (186 words) - 16:14, 16 February 2017
- |Question=What is '''scientific change'''? How should it be ''defined''? ...cientific study of scientific change. Thus, defining the term ''scientific change'' is an important task.1 KB (163 words) - 22:53, 11 December 2022
- |Title=The Laws of Scientific Change |Cover Image=Barseghyan.H The.Laws.of.Scientific.Change.2015.png2 KB (232 words) - 00:54, 3 June 2020
- {{Theory |Title=Possibility of Scientonomy738 bytes (93 words) - 22:38, 19 February 2023
- |Question=Under what circumstances does scientific change become impossible? ...scientific change seeks to identify how such changes are possible. Such a theory must identify and describe which factors allow a community to modify any el1 KB (144 words) - 16:55, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition730 bytes (93 words) - 16:14, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive838 bytes (115 words) - 15:51, 30 March 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Underdetermined Theory Change theorum2 KB (213 words) - 14:40, 28 September 2016
- {{Theory |Topic=Scientific Change2 KB (250 words) - 20:54, 3 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition729 bytes (97 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Topic=Theory Use730 bytes (101 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields1 KB (195 words) - 16:00, 4 July 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Social2 KB (273 words) - 16:11, 6 July 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method927 bytes (125 words) - 01:14, 6 December 2018
- {{Theory |Title=Underdetermined Method Change theorem1 KB (186 words) - 15:49, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive2 KB (252 words) - 18:46, 23 November 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition711 bytes (91 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition871 bytes (110 words) - 14:17, 31 May 2020
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods1 KB (185 words) - 16:02, 4 July 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit2 KB (219 words) - 14:29, 7 July 2017
- |Title=Thinking Big: The Science of Change and the Historicity of Scientific Method ...y of scientific change, evolutionary epistemology, and a general theory of change is investigated.2 KB (278 words) - 22:20, 24 December 2021
- ...in one of the elements of a mosaic can have a "ripple effect" on the rest of the mosaic? ...ripple" changes exhibit the same patterns as other instances of scientific change?2 KB (353 words) - 01:33, 3 September 2019
- |Title=The Relative A Priori as a Model of Radical Conceptual Change in Science ...ibed as empirical. I present evidence to show that the model of scientific change can be applied widely.1 KB (200 words) - 22:28, 24 December 2021
- ...stion is how ''demarcation criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. ...d, Scientific Change, Theory, Mechanism of Scientific Change, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Compatibility Criteria,918 bytes (122 words) - 19:58, 11 December 2022
- {{Theory |Title=Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts3 KB (411 words) - 18:52, 25 July 2017
- ...ion is how ''compatibility criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. ...m of Theory Acceptance, Theory, Mechanism of Scientific Change, Scientific Change, Demarcation Criteria, Acceptance Criteria,943 bytes (124 words) - 19:51, 11 December 2022
- |Title=The fourth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change ...fourth seminar on the theory of scientific change at the IHPST, University of Toronto.520 bytes (73 words) - 00:04, 8 March 2018
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Theory773 bytes (98 words) - 04:30, 19 January 2023
- ...estion is how ''acceptance criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. ...Scientific Change, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Mechanism of Scientific Change,1 KB (142 words) - 19:40, 11 December 2022
- {{Theory |Topic=Theory Acceptance1,002 bytes (133 words) - 04:04, 16 February 2017
- |Title=Scientonomy: The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change ...ested in reviving the project of understanding the mechanism of scientific change while respecting the diversity and complexity that has been unveiled by car2 KB (359 words) - 05:31, 3 December 2021
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition961 bytes (120 words) - 23:57, 15 February 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (158 words) - 19:51, 23 January 2023
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales2 KB (240 words) - 15:59, 4 July 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (160 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- |Title=The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change ...erating a paradox and that neither the third nor zeroth laws of scientific change need be violated. I outline my solution to the paradox and conclude by desc2 KB (282 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
- ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. |Related Topics=Scientific Change, Mosaic Split, Theory of Scientific Change,591 bytes (80 words) - 22:05, 11 December 2022
- ...ry of Scientific Change proposed by Barseghyan in 2015 is a set consisting of the following claims: * [[Theory (Barseghyan-2015)]]3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
- ...ion=Do ''definitions'' play any distinct role in the process of scientific change, or do they only exhibit the exact same patterns as descriptive and normati ...s of scientific change. Philosophical and historical studies of conceptual change suggest a complex underlying dynamics.[[CiteRef::Chi (1992)]][[CiteRef::Chi707 bytes (97 words) - 19:35, 7 October 2018
- ...take towards a theory? Which stances towards a theory ought a scientonomic theory account for? ...ught it also account for scientists decisions to pursue theories as worthy of further development, or their decisions to treat theories as instrumentally3 KB (429 words) - 17:21, 20 October 2022
- ...s the theory of scientific change applicable to theories construed as sets of models, or in ways that reject their purely formal characterization? ...y of scientific change compatible with these more recent and broader views of theories?2 KB (268 words) - 22:51, 9 July 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (143 words) - 13:45, 5 December 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (165 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Scientific Mosaic2 KB (270 words) - 20:37, 3 February 2023
- ...t of an assessment of a theory by a method? What is the complete list of ''theory assessment outcomes''? ...outcome obtains. The question here is what outcomes can possibly obtain in theory assessment?1 KB (172 words) - 17:39, 16 February 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal3 KB (497 words) - 16:04, 4 July 2017
- |Question=What is '''history of scientific change?''' How should it be ''defined?'' ...chanism of Method Employment, Mechanism of Scientific Change, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance702 bytes (88 words) - 21:33, 11 December 2022
- |Title=Episodic Rationality in Scientific Change ...y which is contextually localized, but still presents a clear direction of scientific development at every individual time step.2 KB (255 words) - 22:19, 24 December 2021
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive1 KB (172 words) - 13:08, 13 September 2019
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (180 words) - 18:07, 29 November 2017
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance2 KB (345 words) - 16:54, 11 January 2018
- |Question=How do theories become ''scientific'' or ''unscientific''? ...n. These are the two processes via which an unscientific theory may become scientific.2 KB (344 words) - 05:23, 3 March 2019
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Mosaic Split1 KB (165 words) - 20:46, 6 November 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (186 words) - 18:07, 29 November 2017
- ...happens to other elements in the mosaic when a community undergoes such a change. |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change1,000 bytes (135 words) - 20:46, 26 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (183 words) - 18:06, 29 November 2017
- {{Theory |Topic=Changeability of the Scientific Mosaic3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
- ...ancial constraints or limitations of manpower in the process of scientific change? ...aspect of sociocultural factors affecting the process of theory and method change?1 KB (165 words) - 19:01, 21 March 2017
- |Question=What method ''ought'' to be employed to assess a ''scientonomic theory''? ...for the process of scientific change and the transitions from one accepted theory to another and one employed method to another, [[CiteRef:: Barseghyan (20152 KB (225 words) - 18:53, 15 February 2018
- {{Theory |Title=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive4 KB (641 words) - 21:46, 19 February 2023
- |Title=The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change ...is in line with the growing interest in Integrated History and Philosophy of Science, Social Epistemology, and Cognitive Historiography.4 KB (586 words) - 19:06, 24 December 2021
- {{Theory |Topic=Theory2 KB (334 words) - 20:05, 3 February 2023
- {{Theory |Title=Theory Assessment Outcomes2 KB (265 words) - 18:05, 29 November 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive5 KB (687 words) - 07:15, 7 December 2018
- |Singular Capitalized=Theory Acceptance |Plural Capitalized=Instances of Theory Acceptance2 KB (255 words) - 14:17, 16 January 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition2 KB (211 words) - 19:59, 3 February 2023
- ...best studied in a piecemeal theory-guided fashion. It is an integral part of [[Scientonomic Workflow|the scientonomic workflow]]. ...rrent Mosaic|currently accepted theory]] to historical cases of scientific change;2 KB (242 words) - 01:39, 8 December 2018
- ...tural factors, such as economics or politics, in the process of scientific change? ...of Scientific Change, or they occur in violation of the Laws of Scientific Change.6 KB (959 words) - 05:01, 11 January 2018
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
- ...How Can a Taxonomy of Stances Help Clarify Classical Debates on Scientific Change? ...lly, we outline a few general lessons concerning the process of scientific change.1 KB (200 words) - 16:13, 12 November 2017
- {{Inheritance Theory |Parent=Theory2 KB (198 words) - 00:33, 11 February 2023
- |Title=Feyerabend’s General Theory of Scientific Change354 bytes (42 words) - 17:25, 15 February 2021
- ...ntology'' of epistemic elements that are part of the process of scientific change. ...heories that become accepted and rejected during the process of scientific change. [[CiteRef::Popper (1959)]]7 KB (1,005 words) - 22:02, 27 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (205 words) - 18:03, 29 November 2017
- ...f ''sociocultural factors'', such as economics or politics, in the process of ''method employment''? ...the Laws of Scientific Change, when it is permitted by the employed method of that mosaic.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 239]]4 KB (600 words) - 05:02, 11 January 2018
- ...on=How do theories within a discipline shape and change the core questions of the disciplines? ...estion of how theories within a discipline shape and change core questions of the discipline is an interesting topic for further research.1 KB (181 words) - 22:44, 3 August 2021
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive5 KB (710 words) - 00:14, 5 December 2018
- |Question=How can scientonomy be possible if there are no permanent features of science? ...(Conclusion) Particularism: There can be no general theory of scientific change.5 KB (753 words) - 20:55, 5 December 2018
- ...d''? What kinds of facts ought to be relevant for assessing a scientonomic theory? ...have confirmed novel predictions to become accepted. Should a scientonomic theory be assessed by its ability to make novel predictions? Alternatively, should3 KB (442 words) - 17:47, 22 January 2023
- ...e relationship between reasons and scientific change? Is it possible for a theory to remain accepted while the original reason for its acceptance is replaced ...sons theories? Are reasons theories about theories? Are they components of scientific mosaics?1 KB (217 words) - 14:13, 29 December 2022
- |Title=The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change ...owledge is intrinsically intertwined with scientific knowledge as accepted scientific and technological theories often jointly shape employed methods.2 KB (237 words) - 13:55, 4 January 2019
- ...be accepted by a community, then how can methods be deductive consequences of accepted theories, given that historically employed methods and accepted me ...s and employed methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But, that seems to be clearly not t4 KB (625 words) - 05:53, 11 January 2018
- |Title=The first annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change257 bytes (36 words) - 19:54, 4 November 2016
- |Title=Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change ...rms, can be both ''accepted and employed''. Finally, a new definition of ''scientific mosaic'' is suggested to fit the new ontology.2 KB (243 words) - 21:30, 2 June 2020
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Normative Theory894 bytes (114 words) - 19:49, 10 February 2023
- ..., since science is a social construct, then a general theory of scientific change cannot exist. ...s it raised for the possibility of crafting a general theory of scientific change were clarified.7 KB (1,015 words) - 14:52, 17 July 2016
- |Title=The second annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change304 bytes (41 words) - 17:57, 22 September 2020
- ...hyan (2015)|p. 239]]. In the scientonomic context, a general of scientific change is not possible if science is a social construct [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (201 |Parent Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy6 KB (863 words) - 00:04, 5 December 2018
- {{Theory |Title=Scientific Underdeterminism theorem7 KB (1,073 words) - 21:37, 11 March 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition2 KB (244 words) - 14:37, 12 June 2020
- |Title=The third annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change343 bytes (47 words) - 17:58, 22 September 2020
- ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. ...y evidences that suggest that a scientific community is the reason for the change in the science’ methods and theories.4 KB (545 words) - 23:19, 11 December 2022
- |Title=Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation ...be traced and explained by scientonomy. Thus, we formulate a new ''law of theory demarcation'' to account for changes in scientificity within the scientonom1 KB (157 words) - 22:31, 23 February 2019
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Epistemic Community1 KB (159 words) - 17:24, 9 February 2023
- |Question=What is '''scientific mosaic'''? How should it be ''defined''? ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance.6 KB (799 words) - 19:20, 10 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive4 KB (562 words) - 22:15, 10 November 2023
- |Title=The eight annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change363 bytes (49 words) - 15:39, 1 October 2020
- -->|?Theory<!-- -->|?Theory<!--4 KB (468 words) - 08:19, 11 February 2024
- |Title=The sixth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change385 bytes (50 words) - 21:20, 11 February 2018
- |Question=What is the mechanism of discipline acceptance? How do disciplines become accepted? ...Acceptance| question acceptance]]. Answering the question of the mechanism of discipline acceptance is critical importance to theoretical scientonomy.1 KB (127 words) - 21:59, 3 August 2021
- ...fell under the rationalist umbrella within this highly holistic enterprise of knowledge-seeking.[[CiteRef::Shapere (1986)|p. 4]] ...disciplines that had not made the ''internal'' cut as ''external'' to the scientific enterprise.[[CiteRef::Shapere (1986)]]5 KB (636 words) - 23:23, 11 December 2022
- ...outperforms cases in which researchers only employ the resources from one of the two fields.1 KB (169 words) - 22:16, 24 December 2021
- ...ional scientonomist ''infer'' about a theory's assessment outcome from the theory's acceptance/unacceptance? ...t outcome can be inferred by studying what happened to the theory in terms of its acceptance/unacceptance by the community.[[CiteRef::Patton, Overgaard,1 KB (168 words) - 16:51, 16 October 2022
- |Title=The seventh annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change401 bytes (54 words) - 12:29, 11 October 2018
- |Title=General System-Theoretic Framework for Theories of Scientific Change ...f thinking about explaining changes in scientific worldviews. Even if many of my ideas appear radical, I hope that by contradistinction the reader may ap952 bytes (139 words) - 22:24, 24 December 2021
- ...r who laid the foundations of the general descriptive theory of scientific change418 bytes (60 words) - 10:15, 27 April 2024
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive5 KB (761 words) - 22:20, 10 November 2023
- |Title=The fifth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change460 bytes (59 words) - 12:59, 15 April 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition768 bytes (107 words) - 12:02, 16 January 2024
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition5 KB (761 words) - 17:32, 31 October 2023
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Question846 bytes (105 words) - 20:42, 12 February 2023
- |Question Title=Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...ological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there is any conceivable course of events under which the first law can ''in principle'' be violated.2 KB (247 words) - 22:32, 19 January 2023
- {{Theory |Title=Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic2 KB (273 words) - 14:52, 11 October 2020
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive5 KB (761 words) - 21:41, 1 April 2018
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Question Acceptance893 bytes (110 words) - 14:44, 16 January 2023
- ...o '''methodologies''' play in scientific change? Are methodologies capable of affecting employed methods? ...the questions what is the role of methodologies in facilitating scientific change and can methodologies affect employed methods?4 KB (600 words) - 10:01, 17 March 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (155 words) - 00:55, 3 September 2019
- ...s? Will two unconnected communities experience a similar historical series of changes in their individual '''mosaics'''? ...ver whether or not separate communities would experience similar stages of change in their mosaics and to elucidate under which circumstances such changes ca6 KB (922 words) - 02:24, 14 March 2018
- ...there will be no need in a concept of model separate from that of [[Theory|theory]].1 KB (157 words) - 16:21, 21 February 2023
- |Title=The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change ...of epistemic elements suggests a new avenue of research into the mechanism of question acceptance and rejection, i.e. how epistemic communities come to a2 KB (295 words) - 00:10, 13 May 2018
- ...popularization of laboratory studies, and his development of actor-network theory (ANT) ...e, Scope of Scientonomy - Individual and Social, Social Level, Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Social Construction,596 bytes (83 words) - 17:26, 7 October 2017
- |Question Text Formula=What types of <objects> can be taken by epistemic agents towards <subjects>? |Single Answer Text Formula=The stance of <object> can be taken towards <a subject>.5 KB (671 words) - 17:12, 27 February 2023
- |Question Title=Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) ...ological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there is any conceivable course of events under which the law can ''in principle'' be violated.2 KB (264 words) - 20:21, 3 January 2024
- |Question Title=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) ...ological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there is any conceivable course of events under which the law can ''in principle'' be violated.2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=Theory Acceptance |Question=How do [[Theory|theories]] become [[Theory Acceptance|accepted]] into a mosaic?7 KB (906 words) - 11:22, 14 February 2024
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (158 words) - 00:55, 3 September 2019
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition1 KB (160 words) - 00:54, 3 September 2019
- |Subject=Descriptive Theory ...criptive theories, is any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur?2 KB (216 words) - 17:37, 22 January 2023
- |Title=The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science, edited by Bojana Mladenovic |Publisher=University of Chicago Press2 KB (240 words) - 18:42, 17 March 2023
- ...there any connection between an accepted methodology and the pursuit of a theory? ...This might be because no one has yet identified a way of falsifying string theory. This goes against the falsificationist methodology that is currently widel4 KB (581 words) - 22:44, 5 February 2018
- ...y account for changes in the mosaics of individual scientists, the mosaics of communities, or both? ...should a scientonomic theory trace and account for? Should a scientonomic theory concern itself only with individual scientists, only with communities, or b4 KB (592 words) - 12:11, 4 June 2020
- {{Theory |Title=Indicators of Method Employment3 KB (403 words) - 19:33, 25 July 2017
- |Subject=Normative Theory ...ormative theories, if any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur?2 KB (216 words) - 17:25, 22 January 2023
- |Question=What is the mechanism of '''theory pursuit''', if any? How do theories become ''pursued'' by communities? Is p ...le, it might be interesting to see if there is any logic to the process of theory pursuit.4 KB (658 words) - 17:21, 20 October 2022
- |Title=N. R. Hanson: Observation, Discovery, and Scientific Change ...very. Hanson is noted for his attempts to turn the history and philosophy of science into an integrated field.612 bytes (84 words) - 20:20, 1 September 2016
- {{Theory |Title=Indicators of Theory Acceptance3 KB (491 words) - 20:24, 25 July 2017
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive2 KB (226 words) - 17:06, 22 November 2021
- {{Theory |Topic=Role of Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance6 KB (894 words) - 19:53, 23 November 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive2 KB (223 words) - 20:32, 10 February 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Methods4 KB (541 words) - 13:07, 19 January 2024
- {{Theory |Title=Theory Assessment Outcomes2 KB (248 words) - 20:47, 12 February 2023
- |Subject=Normative Theory |Inherited From=Mechanism of Theory Rejection1 KB (195 words) - 23:19, 2 January 2024
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Normative1 KB (156 words) - 17:47, 29 January 2020
- |Question=Ought a scientonomic theory be ''descriptive'' or ''normative''? ...issue is which of these sorts of questions ought to fall within the scope of scientonomy, and which should not. As a result, the answer to this question6 KB (817 words) - 21:30, 16 October 2022
- ...criptive empirical science of science be applied to solve ''the problem of scientific progress''? ...entonomists can help normative philosophers of science answer the question of whether or not science progresses, and if so how and in what sense.5 KB (783 words) - 19:40, 12 December 2018
- ...nt? Do new methods become accepted simultaneously with the acceptance of a theory? ...which the employment of a method might not follow the acceptance of a new theory.5 KB (663 words) - 14:01, 17 March 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition10 KB (1,501 words) - 18:14, 11 February 2024
- ...e fundamental ''entities'', ''processes'', and ''relations'' of scientific change? ...Cartesian natural philosophy is the epistemic element. There are a number of important ontological questions that arise here:8 KB (1,169 words) - 11:25, 13 February 2024
- ...and the methodological problems associated with writing about unobservable scientific entities. ...urthermore, he argues that the considerable variance in the representation of the electron does not undermine its stable identity or existence.1 KB (196 words) - 13:15, 9 July 2017
- |Question=Do our employed methods and accepted demarcation criteria influence theory construction? ...t Spaces in mathematics. In what way does our mosaic impose constraints on theory construction?1 KB (209 words) - 03:13, 17 October 2022
- |Question=What is the mechanism of discipline rejection? How do disciplines become rejected? ...ected. Answering the question of the mechanism of disciplines rejection is of great importance to theoretical scientonomy.1 KB (139 words) - 21:58, 3 August 2021
- ...track record of previous attempts to create a general theory of scientific change? |Parent Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy717 bytes (97 words) - 16:10, 30 March 2017
- {{Theory |Topic=Synchronism vs. Asynchronism of Method Employment6 KB (871 words) - 20:34, 3 February 2023
- ...provides a promising alternative workflow. We then go on to note a number of practical and theoretical problems that have arisen upon reflection on the |Journal=[[Journal of Scientonomy|Scientonomy]]1 KB (206 words) - 19:05, 25 January 2020
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Epistemic Agent816 bytes (105 words) - 15:50, 9 February 2023
- |Question=When a '''method is rejected''', must it be the case that a theory has also been rejected? |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Method Rejection758 bytes (102 words) - 17:34, 16 February 2017
- {{Existence Theory |Topic=Existence of Definition860 bytes (105 words) - 16:45, 21 February 2023
- ...ory assessment or does every case of theory assessment involve some degree of ''inconclusiveness''? ...|necessary splits]] actually possible, or are all mosaic splits the result of inconclusive assessment? And if they are possible, can we ever as historian5 KB (645 words) - 12:16, 1 November 2022
- ...nge be viewed from the perspective of ''theory construction'' or that of ''theory appraisal''? ...process of theory construction, of that of theory appraisal, or with both of them?4 KB (555 words) - 21:30, 16 October 2022
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance9 KB (1,286 words) - 17:07, 27 January 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Bearers of Mosaic2 KB (222 words) - 15:09, 9 February 2023
- ...'' a scientonomic theory account for only changes to ''explicit elements'' of the mosaic or must it also deal with changes in ''implicit elements'' that ...ow should it treat them? The answer to this question will change the scope of the scientonomic theories.5 KB (785 words) - 21:30, 16 October 2022
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Method Rejection4 KB (529 words) - 17:41, 24 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition5 KB (737 words) - 22:07, 10 November 2023
- {{Inheritance Theory ...xamples is the question “what is the distance from the earth to the sphere of stars?” that was once considered legitimate by astronomers, but is no lon2 KB (279 words) - 19:32, 10 February 2023
- ...hen two or more similar theories are considered equally acceptable by a '''scientific community'''? Under what conditions does a '''mosaic split''' occur? What h ...munities, each bearing its own mosaic. Understanding how and why this sort of situations arise is an important task.7 KB (959 words) - 18:23, 26 February 2023
- ...ange]]. Any theory of scientific change requires a means to explain how a theory becomes rejected. ...cs) are synthetic ''a priori''. As their knowledge is gained independently of experience but is nevertheless synthetic, theories can never be rejected as7 KB (1,049 words) - 19:29, 3 January 2024
- {{Inheritance Theory |Child=Theory2 KB (199 words) - 18:25, 29 December 2022
- |Question=How do [[Normative Theory|norms]] become [[Norm Employment|employed]] by an epistemic agent? ...lps to shed light on one of the key aspects of the mechanism of scientific change.5 KB (671 words) - 11:23, 14 February 2024
- ...gents take stances towards towards epistemic elements? How do changes in a scientific mosaic take place? ...se questions is crucial for our understanding of the process of scientific change.9 KB (1,276 words) - 20:41, 26 February 2023
- |Title=Integrating HPS: What’s in it for a Philosopher of Science? ...nd avoids the problem of cherry-picking which has plagued general accounts of science (Chang, 2011; Mizrahi, 2015).2 KB (233 words) - 22:27, 24 December 2021
- |Description=In the context of discussion concerning scientific change, the terms method and methodology have been traditionally used as synonyms. |Related Topics=Method, Theory, Methodology and Methods,999 bytes (137 words) - 22:05, 11 December 2022
- ...me ''accepted'' as legitimate topics of inquiry? What is the ''mechanism'' of question acceptance? ...legitimate at any given time. Kuhn, for example, recognized that the kinds of questions that can be asked by scientists changes with each paradigm shift,2 KB (322 words) - 19:38, 10 February 2023
- |Plural Capitalized=Instances of Theory Pursuit |Singular Lowercase=theory pursuit4 KB (589 words) - 17:31, 23 September 2023
- ...ociocultural factors'', such as economics or politics, in the process of ''theory acceptance''? ...ience. Can social, political, and economic factor influence the process of theory acceptance and method employment?5 KB (684 words) - 05:30, 11 January 2018
- ...d'' ''ought'' a scientonomic theory account? For changes in which ''fields of inquiry'' ought it to account? Ought it deal only in grand changes, or shou ...only with grand changes, like the scientific revolution, or with the kind of small changes that are constantly going on in science.5 KB (781 words) - 19:36, 30 November 2018
- |Title=Deduction of the Non-Empty Mosaic theorem ...nly when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 226]]946 bytes (129 words) - 10:46, 17 January 2024
- ...this question helps to shed light on one of the key aspects of scientific change. ...lin]] all suggested that our theories about the world shape our methods of theory evaluation.5 KB (708 words) - 11:32, 14 February 2024
- ...y is to explain how methods change through time. Thus, a proper definition of ''method'' is in order. ...ast such as [[Al-Kindi]], [[Alhazen]], and [[Averroes]] were more critical of the Ancients.6 KB (850 words) - 18:45, 9 January 2023
- ...descriptive empirical science of science be applied to solve ''the problem of demarcation''? ...tion, can the historical, descriptive findings of the theory of scientific change contribute anything to this distinction?4 KB (602 words) - 21:51, 5 December 2018
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Mosaic Split6 KB (876 words) - 20:12, 6 November 2023
- |Title=Deduction of the Necessary Method Theorem |Formulation Text=The necessary method theorem is a deductive consequence of the the second and third laws.2 KB (295 words) - 10:53, 17 January 2024
- |Question=Can a method become employed by being the deductive consequence of an already accepted methodology? How would this affect the Methodology Can ...y happen if the requirements of the method implement abstract requirements of some other employed method, a seeming problem for the Third Law.4 KB (504 words) - 04:34, 11 January 2018
- |Question=Are there any '''methods''' which are immune to change? ...onomic community. A method is said to be '''static''' when it is immune to change, and '''dynamic''' when it is not.7 KB (1,031 words) - 15:05, 4 July 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Theory Rejection8 KB (1,153 words) - 16:47, 24 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
- |Plural Capitalized=Instances of Question Acceptance |Plural Lowercase=instances of question acceptance1 KB (154 words) - 14:41, 16 January 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition7 KB (946 words) - 22:05, 19 December 2018
- ...scientific community'''? Can it be defined as more than simply “the bearer of a mosaic”? ...a proper scientonomic definition of the term would help clarify the scope of scientonomy.9 KB (1,337 words) - 16:50, 9 February 2023
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Normative5 KB (657 words) - 20:30, 29 November 2023
- ...an who is widely considered to be the founder of the discipline of history of science ...on on an institutional level in universities and also with the publication of his journal Isis, which continues to this day.15 KB (2,418 words) - 16:13, 10 January 2018
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Descriptive12 KB (1,835 words) - 19:46, 23 November 2023
- ...rity delegation, hierarchical anomaly-tolerance, compatibility criteria or theory acceptance criteria? ...the laws of scientific change) is unknown. The trans-historical prevalence of hierarchical structures surrounding theories suggests that these structures9 KB (1,321 words) - 22:20, 4 November 2022
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition6 KB (809 words) - 19:52, 10 February 2023
- |Brief=an American philosopher of science who greatly shaped the debates in the field from the late 1970s til ...valuation change together with scientific [[Theory|theories]] and goals of scientific inquiry in a piecemeal rational fashion. He later defended his view from th12 KB (1,816 words) - 13:14, 17 January 2018
- {{Theory |Title=The Law of Norm Employment3 KB (408 words) - 11:14, 23 February 2024
- {{Theory |Theory Type=Definition4 KB (646 words) - 20:20, 13 January 2023
- {{Inheritance Theory ...Barseghyan, epistemic community is an epistemic agent, i.e. it is capable of taking [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stances]] towards [[Epistemic Element|e2 KB (227 words) - 20:32, 2 March 2023
- ...ersal scientific method and proposing allegedly anarchistic/dadaistic view of science ...mporary terms as the Static Method Thesis). Feyerabend’s anarchistic views of science are exemplified throughout his extensive works. His propositions de12 KB (1,781 words) - 12:57, 29 June 2017
- |Question Title=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...ogical or non-tautological, i.e. whether there are any conceivable courses of events under which the second law can in principle be violated.2 KB (228 words) - 22:37, 19 January 2023
- ...:Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 159-161]] What conditions allow for the coexistence of elements, and what conditions require modification or rejection to take pla |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change5 KB (686 words) - 20:39, 26 February 2023
- ...opher of science who greatly contributed to the problem of demarcation and theory choice in science ...SRP. He met an untimely death due to a heart attack at the age of 51. Some of Feyerabend’s objections remain challenging to this day.12 KB (1,735 words) - 15:27, 7 September 2017
- ...benevolent God, were reliable sources of knowledge about an external world of material objects. ...t he could show through reason alone that our senses were reliable sources of know8 KB (1,099 words) - 22:02, 27 February 2023
- ...ted the conclusions of the Scholastics by the age of 15 in favour of those of Descartes and the Mechanists. His philosophical influences thus included bo == Main Contributions to the Philosophy of Scientific Change ==10 KB (1,682 words) - 00:12, 24 February 2016
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Compatibility21 KB (3,113 words) - 20:16, 10 February 2023
- ...tributions on the role of values in science, role of social interaction in scientific objectivity and social epistemology ...cientific objectivity and knowledge is a property of the community instead of individual scientists.15 KB (2,185 words) - 08:43, 2 December 2017
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories12 KB (1,712 words) - 17:12, 2 November 2023
- ...of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. ...definition conflated the fact of method employment with scientonomic means of ''detecting'' method employment.4 KB (520 words) - 20:19, 13 January 2023
- ...''individual'' be a bearer of a mosaic? Can an ''instrument'' be a bearer of a mosaic? |Predicate=bearer of mosaic10 KB (1,480 words) - 15:02, 9 February 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Nature of Appraisal22 KB (3,339 words) - 17:13, 31 October 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Mosaic Split21 KB (3,194 words) - 21:45, 10 November 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Method Employment18 KB (2,630 words) - 15:49, 4 February 2023
- ...ce and theory. Specifically, he brought to light the idea that due to lack of logic linking hypothesis with evidence, data is not enough to know whether ...tatement that gravity was deduced from phenomena, and the entire structure of induction11 KB (1,746 words) - 16:42, 15 June 2017
- ...''the philosophy of science'', ''the history of science'', ''the sociology of science'', and ''cognitive science''? ...include the scope, possibility, and assessment of any theory of scientific change.16 KB (2,219 words) - 08:19, 11 February 2024
- {{Theory |Topic=Synchronism vs. Asynchronism of Method Rejection14 KB (2,079 words) - 19:13, 24 February 2023
- {{Theory |Topic=Mechanism of Method Employment8 KB (1,168 words) - 17:24, 7 May 2023
- ...generally regarded as one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century ...s most important epistemological works were [[Popper (1959)|''The Logic of Scientific Discovery'']][[CiteRef::Popper (1959)]], which was originally published in13 KB (1,923 words) - 03:41, 2 June 2020
- ...an important early contribution to the historical philosophy and sociology of science ...cused on the historical development and fallibility of “facts” as a result of faulty social constructions.19 KB (2,858 words) - 14:03, 13 April 2018
- ...d logician. He was a prominent member of the Vienna Circle and a proponent of logical positivism .... It posited that empirical knowledge is structured by analytic statements of mathematics and logic.[[CiteRef::Uebel (2016)]]15 KB (2,231 words) - 16:15, 10 January 2018
- ...astronomer, chemist, inventor, experimental photographer, and philosopher of science ...is contemporaries/immediate predecessors, came back to become the dominant scientific method.[[CiteRef::Laudan (1981a)|p. 14]]13 KB (2,131 words) - 04:19, 17 January 2018
- ...step in understanding the role of disciplines in the process of scientific change. ...le, when physicists say "Physics is the study of the nature and properties of matter and energy", do they mean this as a definition, description, or pres4 KB (598 words) - 18:55, 10 February 2023
- |Brief=a British natural philosopher and founder of experimentalism and empirical science. ...d in his revolutionary text Novum Organum, describing his reformulation of scientific thinking that employs inductive reasoning to make predictions about the wor19 KB (2,923 words) - 16:14, 10 January 2018
- ...osopher who is widely recognized as one of the most influential scientists of all time ...lly created physics as its own scientific field separate from the umbrella of metaphysics and philosophy. [[CiteRef::Janiak (2016)]]19 KB (2,653 words) - 02:03, 15 March 2018
- ...cs ranging from the nature of scientific reasoning to theory-ladenness and scientific progress ...rk on these ideas is presented in his 1843 book, [[Mill (1974a)|''A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive'']].27 KB (4,114 words) - 22:49, 21 June 2018
- ...n Ancient Greek philosopher who together with Socrates and Plato laid much of the groundwork for western philosophy and science ...hange are his theory of causation, theories on metaphysics, and his method of science, which was based on intuition schooled by experience.16 KB (2,413 words) - 13:29, 16 March 2018
- |Brief=a French natural philosopher; who is today considered one of the most influential figures in modern philosophy ...ainbow, and formulated a precursor of the nebular hypothesis of the origin of the solar system.[[CiteRef::Hatfield (2016)]]27 KB (3,968 words) - 02:04, 15 March 2018
- ...cientific mosaic of the modern world. [[CiteRef::Hyman (2007)]] The impact of these fallibilist arguments is still felt to this day. ...tern '''Calvinist faith''', with prayers and sermons as prominent features of his home and university life. [[CiteRef:: Morris and Brown (2016)]]35 KB (5,182 words) - 17:57, 14 September 2018
