Associations of Epistemic Agent
How is the class of epistemic agent associated with other classes (and itself)? What aggregation, composition, or other association relations can exist between epistemic agents, as well as between an epistemic agent and instances of other classes?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The following associations of Epistemic Agent are currently accepted in Scientonomy:
- An epistemic agent can delegate authority to another epistemic agent.
- An epistemic agent can rely on any number of epistemic tools, while an epistemic tool can be relied on by one-to-many agent.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 8 October 2018 | The question of Associations of Epistemic Agent became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Epistemic Agent. The publication of Barseghyan (2018) is an indication of the acceptance of the term. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Epistemic Agent Can Delegate Authority to Another Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019) | An epistemic agent can delegate authority to another epistemic agent. | 2019 |
Epistemic Agent Can Rely on Epistemic Tools (Patton-2019) | An epistemic agent can rely on any number of epistemic tools, while an epistemic tool can be relied on by one-to-many agent. | 2019 |
Accepted Direct Answers
Community | Theory | Formulation | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Epistemic Agent Can Delegate Authority to Another Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019) | An epistemic agent can delegate authority to another epistemic agent. | 6 February 2023 | |
Scientonomy | Epistemic Agent Can Rely on Epistemic Tools (Patton-2019) | An epistemic agent can rely on any number of epistemic tools, while an epistemic tool can be relied on by one-to-many agent. | 23 February 2024 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Date Assessed | Verdict | Verdict Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2019-0018 | Scientonomy | 26 December 2019 | Accept that the relationship of tool reliance can obtain between epistemic agents and epistemic tools. Also accept the definition of tool reliance, which states that an epistemic agent is said to rely on an epistemic tool when there is a procedure through which the tool can provide an acceptable source of knowledge for answering some question under the employed method of that agent. | 23 February 2024 | Accepted | The modification was discussed during the 2024 workshop. Firstly, the similarity between this definition and the recently accepted modification suggesting a definition of epistemic tool was highlighted by the community as an indicator that this modification might require further work to separate out its definitional content from dynamics content before it could be accepted. However, most of the discussion surrounding the modification concerned, as Jamie Shaw put it, whether the distinction between authority delegation and tool reliance was a distinction without a difference. Deivide Garcia suggested that there is a meaningful difference between the two: epistemic tools are inherently passive, whereas epistemic agents inherently play an active role both in tool reliance and in authority delegation. Paul Patton highlighted several examples of “troubleshooting” epistemic tools in the history of science, which is suggestive of a relationship between the epistemic agent and the epistemic tool that differs significantly from the relationship between two epistemic agents in an authority delegation relation. Yet, Hakob Barseghyan highlighted that the process of troubleshooting of tools could be conceptualized in different terms very similar to how scientonomers already describe authority delegation relations. Joshua Allen suggested that the modification would be useful to accept anticipating further work being done on the relationship between epistemic tools and epistemic actions. Ultimately, after most participants agreed that the modification was useful in its current state, the modification was accepted with over 2/3rds majority (11 votes to accept, 4 votes to keep the modification open). |
Current View
In Scientonomy, the following associations of Epistemic Agent are currently accepted:
- An epistemic agent can delegate authority to another epistemic agent.
- An epistemic agent can rely on any number of epistemic tools, while an epistemic tool can be relied on by one-to-many agent.
Epistemic Agent Can Delegate Authority to Another Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019) states: "An epistemic agent can delegate authority to another epistemic agent."
Epistemic Agent Can Rely on Epistemic Tools (Patton-2019) states: "An epistemic agent can rely on any number of epistemic tools, while an epistemic tool can be relied on by one-to-many agent."
According to Patton, the relation that obtains between an epistemic agent and an epistemic tool used by the agent during their inquiry is that of tool reliance. For Patton, this is different from the relation of authority delegation that obtains between two epistemic agents.1
Related Topics
References
- ^ Patton, Paul. (2019) Epistemic Tools and Epistemic Agents in Scientonomy. Scientonomy 3, 63-89. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/33621.