Disjointness of Subquestion

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What other classes is the class of subquestion disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with subquestion?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Cyrus Al-Zayadi in 2021. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Subquestion in Scientonomy.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 August 2021The question of Disjointness of Subquestion became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Subquestion. This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology hat offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community.Yes

All Theories

No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia. If a theory stating the disjointness of subquestion with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Subquestion.


Related Topics