Property:Editor Notes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A
Checked and OK except no prehistory +
C
An example or two would be nice +
A few examples would be nice +
This is a cocktail from several questions. One about the existence of conclusive assessment. Second about the indicators of conclusive assessment. TODO: it needs to be unpacked. +
D
Perhaps some prehistory would be nice +
Needs prehistory and elaboration of description +
E
This needs to be renamed to Method Employment to ensure that it is in tune with the naming convention for epistemic stances (eg. Theory Acceptance). +
TODO: Nikki write a description +
TODO: Nikki add a description +
I
The prehistory is extremely poorly written. I've fixed it a bit, but there is more work to be done. +
L
TODO: Nikki add a description +
M
Needs a proper description, prehistory, history +
TODO: add more description and history +
TODO: add history and description +
I am not sure this belongs here. Seems like an epistemic practice question, a sub question of how are theories being constructed +
N
Why normative in the title? +
O
The whole prehistory needs rewriting. It's very poor at the moment. +
P
TODO: prehistory is needed. There is a whole literature on the role of the provenance of the theory on its acceptance. +
Q
TODO: Nikki add a description +
R
TODO: add prehistory and description +
