Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Editor Notes" with value "TODO: add more description and history". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 14 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

    • Role of Definitions in Scientific Change  + (TODO: add prehistory)
    • Reducibility of Definitions  + (TODO: add prehistory and description)
    • Pursuit and Acceptance  + (TODO: prehistory is needed. There is a whole literature on the role of the provenance of the theory on its acceptance.)
    • Individual Level  + (The prehistory is extremely poorly written. I've fixed it a bit, but there is more work to be done.)
    • The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)  + (The prehistory section is too broad. It gives a general prehistory of the TOPIC, rather than a prehistory of the THEORY. This section should credit only those philosophers who understood that theories are being evaluated by the method OF THE TIME.)
    • Ontology of Scientific Change  + (The whole prehistory needs rewriting. It's very poor at the moment.)
    • Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)  + (The whole thing needs to be edited with a The whole thing needs to be edited with a simple idea in mind: we are still very much a project of science of science, rather than a full-fledged science of science. HB I went over the article and made some minor changes in wording to stress the preliminary nature of scientonomy. I also added a reference. I also added a reference. I am leaving it as 'needs editing' because a prehistory still needs to be added. PPe a prehistory still needs to be added. PP)
    • Conclusive Theory Assessment  + (This is a cocktail from several questions. One about the existence of conclusive assessment. Second about the indicators of conclusive assessment. TODO: it needs to be unpacked.)
    • Static vs. Dynamic Methods  + (This is a monstrosity that needs overhaul)
    • Status of Reasons  + (This is poorly named)
    • Employed Method  + (This needs to be renamed to Method Employment to ensure that it is in tune with the naming convention for epistemic stances (eg. Theory Acceptance).)
    • Normative Effects of Scientonomy  + (Why normative in the title?)
    • Theory Displacement  + (prehistory with specific examples needed. A new title is needed. The current one does not cover the gist.)