Search by property
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Hierarchical Authority Delegation Is a Subtype of Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017) + (Hierarchical Authority Delegation)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (If a pair of elements satisfies the compat … If a pair of elements satisfies the compatibility criteria employed at the time, it becomes compatible within the mosaic; if it does not, it is deemed incompatible; and if assessment is inconclusive, the pair can become compatible, incompatible, or its status may be unknown.ncompatible, or its status may be unknown.)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (If a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes accepted into the mosaic; if it does not, it remains unaccepted; if assessment is inconclusive, the theory can be accepted or not accepted.)
- The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (If a theory satisfies the demarcation criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes scientific; if it does not, it remains unscientific; if assessment is inconclusive, the theory’s status can become scientific, unscientific, or uncertain.)
- Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (If an accepted theory is taken as the final truth, it will always remain accepted; no new theory on the subject can ever be accepted.)
- Response to the Argument from Nothing Permanent (Barseghyan-2015) + (If there were indeed nothing permanent in science, then scientonomy would be impossible, however, scientonomy posits only that there are regularities in the process of scientific change.)
- Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) + (Implicit)
- Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (In order for the process of scientific change to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. That is, scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic.)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (In order for the process of scientific change to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one employed method.)
- The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) + (In order to become accepted into the mosaic, a theory is assessed by the method actually employed at the time.)
- Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019) + (Individual Epistemic Agent)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Social (Barseghyan-2015) + (It is implicit in the definition of scient … It is implicit in the definition of scientonomy that it should explain changes in the scientific mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods, which are changes at the level of the scientific community. It need not account for changes at the level of the beliefs of individuals.t the level of the beliefs of individuals.)
- Outcome Inconclusive (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (It is unclear whether or not the requirements of the method employed at the time are met.)
- Local Epistemic Action Is a Subtype of Epistemic Action (Allen-2023) + (Local Epistemic Action)
- Method Is a Subtype of Normative Theory (Barseghyan-2018) + (Method)
- Method Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015) + (Method)
- Element Decay Is a Non-Scientonomic Phenomenon (Oh-2021) + (Non-Scientonomic)
- Inexplicable (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) + (Non-propositional knowledge, i.e. knowledge that cannot, even in principle, be formulated as a set of propositions.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018) + (Norm Employment)
- Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018) + (Norm Employment)
- Normative Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Sebastien-2016) + (Normative Theory)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (Not Tautological)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (Not Tautological)
- The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (Not Tautological)
- Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) + (Not explicit.)
- Bearers of Mosaic - Communities (Barseghyan-2015) + (Only a community can be a bearer of a scientific mosaic.)
- Outcome Accept Is a Subtype of Outcome Inconclusive (Delaney-2022) + (Outcome Accept)
- Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) + (Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent.)
- Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) + (Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent.)
- Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018) + (Propositional technological knowledge can be accepted and be part of a mosaic.)
- Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018) + (Question)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018) + (Question Acceptance)
- Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018) + (Question Acceptance)
- Response to the Argument from Social Construction (Barseghyan-2015) + (Science can be said to be socially constructed in several different senses (e.g. the contingency, nominalist, and reducibility theses). None of these preclude the possibility of scientonomy.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (Scientificity)
- Scientificity Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (Scientificity)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016) + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline wh … Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline whose main task is to explain the process of changes in the scientific mosaic. It is distinct from normative methodology, whose task is to evaluate and prescribe methods. The findings of scientonomy may be used in such normative evaluations, but scientonomy itself should not be expected to perform any normative functions.pected to perform any normative functions.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy ought to account for all scientific changes for all time periods where a scientific mosaic can be found.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy ought to address the issue of how transitions from one accepted theory to another take place and what logic governs this evolution, and need not deal in questions of theory pursuit or use.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major.)
- Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015) + (Tautological)
- The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) is Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (Tautological)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (Tautological)
- The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (Tautological)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (Tautological)