Scientificity of Methods
Revision as of 22:12, 23 February 2019 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs)
Can the epistemic stance of scientificity be taken towards methods? Can there be unscientific or pseudoscientific methods?
TODO: Add a description
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar in 2018.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Our records state that this question has never been accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by any community.
All Theories
No direct answers to the question have been suggested. Note that the question might still have subanswers (answers to its subquestions) and superanswers (answers to its superquestions).
If a direct answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
No direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
There have been no suggested modifications concerning direct answers to this question.
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Epistemic Stances Towards Methods.
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
- ^ Rawleigh, William. (2018) The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 1-12. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29651.
- ^ Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.
