Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...e, i.e. methods without which no change in a mosaic is possible.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 226-233]] |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan
    2 KB (228 words) - 17:10, 22 January 2023
  • ...ist=Gregory Rupik, Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Jacob MacKinnon, Hakob Barseghyan, Jacqueline Sereda, Mirka Loiselle, Zachery Brown, Mathew Mercuri, Jennifer
    520 bytes (73 words) - 00:04, 8 March 2018
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
    1 KB (165 words) - 20:46, 6 November 2023
  • |Authors List=Aayu Pandey, Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Formulation File=Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023).png
    4 KB (492 words) - 11:05, 20 June 2024
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
    1 KB (172 words) - 13:08, 13 September 2019
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley ...publication of [[Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)|''Question Dynamics'']] by Barseghyan and Levesley where the first law for questions was formulated is a solid in
    2 KB (214 words) - 12:25, 20 June 2024
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...cepted its first answer to this question, Indicators of Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan 2015), which indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate.
    1 KB (175 words) - 16:48, 16 October 2022
  • |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)
    1 KB (166 words) - 19:20, 3 March 2023
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik
    751 bytes (95 words) - 12:47, 9 June 2024
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...theory is considered as revealing the final and absolute truth".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 165]]
    3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Formulation File=Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png
    3 KB (482 words) - 12:45, 20 June 2024
  • |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, ...ch also addresses the problem of lack of commenting. As stated by Shaw and Barseghyan:
    2 KB (312 words) - 17:11, 29 January 2020
  • |Formulation File=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,
    3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ommunity accepted its first definition of the term, [[Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)]].
    1 KB (185 words) - 15:01, 8 June 2024
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=Theory (Barseghyan-2015).png
    2 KB (334 words) - 20:05, 3 February 2023
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...es not undermine the possibility of the theory of scientific change (TSC). Barseghyan shows that each of the theses lead to bizarre implications that form threat
    5 KB (710 words) - 00:14, 5 December 2018
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...nclusive outcome ("''can''" be accepted") is also conceivable. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 200]]
    2 KB (243 words) - 13:15, 22 June 2024
  • |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ty accepted its first answer to the question, [[The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the questions is itself considered legitimate
    1 KB (186 words) - 12:17, 20 June 2024
  • The project was first announced by [[Hakob Barseghyan]] on 15 January 2016. |description=Hakob Barseghyan announces ''The Tree of Knowledge'' project
    3 KB (494 words) - 11:52, 12 August 2019
  • ...discussions such that they do not extend indefinitely."[[CiteRef::Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)]] Thus, it is important for the scientonomic workflow to have a prop |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan,
    2 KB (259 words) - 16:57, 29 January 2020

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)