Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Create the page "Law" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    ...e First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...is a deductive consequence of the first law, the second law, and the third law.
    1 KB (159 words) - 10:40, 17 January 2024
  • File:The First Law for Methods Deduction.png
    ...Law for Methods|the first law for methods]] from [[The First Law|the first law]].
    (1,322 × 263 (29 KB)) - 04:13, 17 February 2016
  • File:The First Law for Theories Deduction.png
    ...w for Theories|the first law for theories]] from [[The First Law|the first law]].
    (1,331 × 262 (29 KB)) - 04:14, 17 February 2016
  • The Law of Method Employment (Rawleigh-2022)
    |Title=The Law of Method Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Method Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png
    1 KB (157 words) - 16:26, 30 October 2022
  • File:The Second Law Barseghyan 2015.png
    [[The Second Law|The second law]] of scientific change.
    (712 × 260 (17 KB)) - 19:11, 17 August 2016
  • File:The Third Law Barseghyan 2015.png
    [[The Third Law|The third law]] of scientific change.
    (816 × 262 (19 KB)) - 13:24, 18 August 2016
  • File:The First Law Barseghyan 2015.png
    [[The First Law|The first law]] of scientific change.
    (624 × 262 (14 KB)) - 02:31, 5 September 2016
  • The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)
    668 bytes (87 words) - 20:25, 3 January 2024
  • The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)
    664 bytes (87 words) - 20:22, 3 January 2024
  • The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    688 bytes (89 words) - 20:34, 3 January 2024
  • The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    700 bytes (89 words) - 20:50, 3 January 2024
  • Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) ...plit'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law.
    1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
  • The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
    708 bytes (89 words) - 20:40, 3 January 2024
  • File:The Zeroth Law Harder 2015.png
    [[The Zeroth Law|The zeroth law]] of scientific change.
    (904 × 214 (14 KB)) - 02:52, 5 September 2016
  • Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...pty mosaic'' theorem follows deductively from the second law and the third law.
    946 bytes (129 words) - 10:46, 17 January 2024
  • File:The Third Law Barseghyan 2015 Extended.png
    The extended version of [[The Third Law|the third law]] of scientific change.
    (973 × 412 (36 KB)) - 13:24, 18 August 2016
  • Lovejoy (1888)
    |Publisher=British Law: Constitutional Law: Special Topics
    284 bytes (39 words) - 21:52, 30 November 2017
  • Fraser and Sarwar (2018)
    |Title=A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change ...s how the stance of compatibility obtains. Unlike the zeroth law, this new law has empirical content, as it forbids certain conceivable scenarios. Having
    1 KB (190 words) - 03:29, 22 March 2019
  • File:The Second Law Deduction.png
    The deduction of [[The Second Law|the second law]] from the definition of "employed method".
    (1,266 × 260 (30 KB)) - 04:15, 17 February 2016
  • The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    1 KB (170 words) - 23:20, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is Barseghyan's original second law a tautology?
    2 KB (228 words) - 22:37, 19 January 2023
  • The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)
    |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Question=Is Harder's zeroth law a tautology?
    2 KB (214 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Question=Is the second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 a tautology?
    2 KB (250 words) - 23:02, 19 January 2023
  • The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    2 KB (367 words) - 20:16, 3 January 2024
  • Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Question=Is the law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 a tautolog
    2 KB (253 words) - 23:19, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
    2 KB (247 words) - 22:32, 19 January 2023
  • Modification:Sciento-2017-0005
    |Summary=Accept that the new second law is not a tautology. ...tance/unacceptance explicit and thus shows that the new formulation of the law is not a tautology, as it clearly forbids certain logically possible scenar
    2 KB (284 words) - 21:55, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Question=Is the law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 a tautology?
    2 KB (240 words) - 19:27, 23 January 2023
  • Category:Descriptive Theory
    ...[[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|Sebastien's 2016 formulation of the third law]]. Please see [[Guidelines:Theories|the guidelines]] for details.
    86 members (1 subcategory, 0 files) - 15:21, 15 January 2023
  • The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) is Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)
    1 KB (163 words) - 22:52, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
    2 KB (264 words) - 20:21, 3 January 2024
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
    2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
  • The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Title=The First Law for Theories |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Theories
    612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
  • Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...praisal theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law and the second law.
    1 KB (197 words) - 10:52, 17 January 2024
  • The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
    |Title=The First Law for Questions |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Questions
    644 bytes (82 words) - 19:36, 2 January 2024
  • The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Conclusion=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...rements".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129]] Thus, he argues, the second law is a mere explication of what is implicit in the definition of ''employed m
    752 bytes (102 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2023
  • The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Title=The First Law for Norms |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories
    634 bytes (83 words) - 19:43, 2 January 2024
  • Category:Hypothesis
    ...parate page exists for Barseghyan's second law of 2015 and Patton's second law of 2016.
    0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 20:20, 15 August 2016
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?
    2 KB (219 words) - 20:49, 3 January 2024
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?
    2 KB (220 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
  • Application of Scientonomy to Delayed Rejection
    ...bility sufficient to explain them? Do delayed rejections violate the First Law or the other laws?
    400 bytes (55 words) - 10:38, 9 November 2018
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) |Question=Is the first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Levesley in 2021 a tautology?
    2 KB (219 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
  • The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    1 KB (164 words) - 23:12, 19 January 2023
  • Modification:Sciento-2023-0003
    |Summary=Accept that the first law and its corollaries are tautologies. Also accept that the rejection theorem ...entonomy and admit that such cases present a serious anomaly for the first law.
    3 KB (439 words) - 17:38, 22 February 2024
  • Modification:Sciento-2023-0002
    ...s, norms, and questions that are in tune with the formulation of the first law. Also accept new formulations of the respective rejection theorems - theory ...-Pandey-2023), The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023), The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021), Theory Rejection theorem (Barsegh
    2 KB (194 words) - 23:35, 2 January 2024
  • The Third Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]
    44 bytes (5 words) - 06:01, 10 February 2017
  • Third Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]
    44 bytes (5 words) - 17:59, 7 December 2017
  • The First Law
    #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    45 bytes (5 words) - 15:39, 30 September 2016
  • First Law
    #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    45 bytes (5 words) - 18:00, 7 December 2017
  • The Zeroth Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]
    42 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 30 September 2016
  • Zeroth Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]
    42 bytes (5 words) - 18:01, 7 December 2017
  • File:The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png
    The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    (1,079 × 316 (28 KB)) - 16:11, 5 February 2017
  • Second Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
    63 bytes (5 words) - 17:35, 7 December 2017
  • The Second Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
    63 bytes (5 words) - 08:47, 2 December 2017
  • The Theory of Scientific Change
    * [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]] * [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
  • Tautological Status of the First Law
    #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    69 bytes (8 words) - 22:33, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of the Zeroth Law
    #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]
    66 bytes (8 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of the Second Law
    #REDIRECT [[Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
    86 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 19 January 2023
  • File:Asynchronism of Method Employment Theorem.png
    ...asynchronism of method employment theorem]] from [[The Third Law|the third law]].
    (1,372 × 316 (40 KB)) - 04:07, 17 February 2016
  • Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...em is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.
    1 KB (145 words) - 11:05, 17 January 2024
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...em is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.
    1 KB (149 words) - 10:49, 17 January 2024
  • Pandey (2023)
    |Title=Dilemma of the First Law ...t law is not a tautology, but these cases stand as violations of the first law. The paper resolves this dilemma by opting for the former option: cases of
    2 KB (311 words) - 17:50, 1 January 2024
  • Local Action Availability theorem (Allen-2023) Reason1
    |Premises=Local Action Availability (Allen-2023), The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022) ...''local action availability'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the ''law of norm employment'' and the definition of ''local action availability''
    835 bytes (105 words) - 10:44, 17 January 2024
  • The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=law of theory acceptance
    3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
  • File:The Third Law Sebastien 2016.png
    The new formulation of the third law suggested by Sebastien in 2016.
    (889 × 263 (20 KB)) - 13:24, 18 August 2016
  • Tautological Status of the Law of Theory Demarcation
    #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
  • Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    ...all the theorems that were thought to be deducible by means of the zeroth law (e.g. [[Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)|the theory rejection the
    2 KB (226 words) - 17:06, 22 November 2021
  • Modification:Sciento-2022-0002
    ...he new law of norm employment that fixes some of the issues of the current law of method employment and makes it applicable to norms of all types. ...at methods be subsumed under the category of normative theories, the third law no longer exhaustively covers any situation in which we employ any kind of
    3 KB (492 words) - 16:29, 30 October 2022
  • Modification:Sciento-2017-0004
    ...ond Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)|the reformulation of the second law]] which explicitly links theory assessment outcomes with theory acceptance/ ...Ref::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 202-208]] Thus, a new formulation of the second law is needed that says how specific outcomes of theory assessment determine th
    3 KB (457 words) - 13:14, 8 March 2018
  • Modification:Sciento-2016-0001
    |Summary=Accept a new formulation of the third law to make it clear that employed methods do not have to be deducible from ''a ...ssible in cases where methodologies and methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But
    2 KB (335 words) - 01:03, 24 January 2017
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason2
    |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) ...ic would contain mutually incompatible elements, which is forbidden by the law of compatibility. Therefore, there is only one scenario when a theory can n
    2 KB (352 words) - 10:57, 17 January 2024
  • Deriving Methods from an Empty Set
    ...from an empty set pose a problem for the current formulation of the third law? Can we conceive of a situation in which a method is derived from an empty ...nal scientonomists we would want to consider this a violation of the third law, but is this different than other potential violations?
    1 KB (167 words) - 20:27, 24 February 2023
  • Modification:Sciento-2018-0014
    |Summary=Accept the ''law of theory demarcation'' as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions ...atisfy it preclude scientific and unscientific status of the theory, the ''law of theory demarcation'' is non-tautological.
    2 KB (270 words) - 14:31, 29 July 2023
  • The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
    |Title=The Law of Question Acceptance |Formulation File=The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png
    609 bytes (80 words) - 23:39, 29 July 2021
  • Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016)
    |Formulation Text=The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that empl # by [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the third law]], employed methods are deducible from accepted theories, including methodo
    2 KB (338 words) - 21:36, 14 March 2018
  • The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    |Title=The Law of Theory Demarcation ...ntific status of theories changes overtime. The assessment outcomes of the law (satisfied, unsatisfied, and inconclusive) are ''logically'' separated from
    1 KB (157 words) - 06:00, 3 March 2019
  • Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...the third law). Indeed, if we recall the historical examples of the third law that we have discussed, we will see that new methods become employed when t
    2 KB (295 words) - 10:53, 17 January 2024
  • Modification:Sciento-2018-0018
    |Summary=Accept the new dynamic law of compatibility which specifies how exactly two elements become to be cons ...of modifications are necessary, including the acceptance of a ''dynamic'' law of compatibility that explains how a pair of elements comes to be considere
    3 KB (491 words) - 16:48, 21 February 2023
  • Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...of the dictator or the ruling party. In short, it follows from the second law that sociocultural factors can affect a theory’s acceptance insofar as th
    2 KB (233 words) - 19:56, 23 November 2023
  • Burkholder (2014)
    |Title=Protomethod, The Third Law, and Ethical Propositions
    184 bytes (21 words) - 01:17, 11 March 2017
  • The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022)
    |Title=The Law of Norm Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png
    3 KB (408 words) - 11:14, 23 February 2024
  • Modification:Sciento-2018-0015
    ...ity of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic. Also replace the zeroth law with the ''compatibility corollary''. ...ty corollary'', which collectively preserve the gist of the current zeroth law.
    3 KB (491 words) - 16:47, 21 February 2023
  • Harder (2013)
    |Title=Scientific Mosaics and the Law of Consistency
    173 bytes (21 words) - 02:01, 1 October 2016
  • The Second Law is a Tautology (Barseghyan-2015)
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    80 bytes (8 words) - 21:02, 19 January 2023
  • Deducibility in Method Employment
    |Question=What does deducibility in the [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|the law of method employment]] mean? Does it refer to the deducibility of classic l |Description=The current formulation of the law of method employment asserts that a method becomes employed when it is dedu
    2 KB (293 words) - 02:47, 17 October 2022
  • Gideon Yaffe
    |Brief=a professor of law and philosophy at Yale University
    165 bytes (26 words) - 03:56, 19 December 2017
  • Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...m is a deductive consequence of the method rejection theorem and the third law.
    1 KB (189 words) - 10:51, 17 January 2024
  • The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    #REDIRECT: [[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fras
    106 bytes (11 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
  • Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)
    |Title=Reformulating the Second Law ...he method employed at the time. We propose a new formulation of the second law: “If a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method actually em
    1 KB (211 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
  • Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)
    855 bytes (115 words) - 10:43, 17 January 2024
  • Callon, Rip, and Law (Eds.) (1986)
    |Author=Michel Callon, Arie Rip, John Law,
    230 bytes (29 words) - 15:11, 29 March 2018
  • Theory vs. Method Compatibility
    |Description=The currently-accepted [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]] states that all elements of a mosaic must be compatible with each other. ...terms of compatibility for theories, even though the formulation of Zeroth Law might imply otherwise. This is further justified by the fact that which com
    1 KB (205 words) - 07:00, 7 March 2018
  • Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...ally employed at the time, and the [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|third law]], which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible f
    2 KB (252 words) - 18:46, 23 November 2023
  • The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Title=The First Law |Alternate Titles=the law of scientific inertia
    4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
  • Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...methods and [[Rory Harder|Harder]]'s [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|zeroth law]]. Barseghyan noted that this initial deduction was "similar to that of the ...s, the new method is in conflict with the old method. In this case, by the law of compatibility, the old method will have to go.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (201
    4 KB (529 words) - 17:41, 24 February 2023
  • The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Title=The Law of Compatibility |Formulation File=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png
    2 KB (330 words) - 20:54, 9 October 2021
  • Demarcation-Acceptance Synchronism (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    ...is contradicted. Therefore, if the definition of theory acceptance and the law of demarcation criteria are accepted, then it must also be accepted that ac
    2 KB (225 words) - 16:07, 12 October 2020
  • Modification:Sciento-2019-0011
    ...ts deduction from the definition of ''sufficient reason'' and the ''second law''. ...agent accepts. From the definition of a sufficient reason, and the second law, one can deduce the sufficient reason theorem which shows how a sufficient
    930 bytes (130 words) - 01:45, 29 January 2020
  • The Paradox of Normative Propositions
    ...ere accepted methodologies and employed methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But ...f ''methodologies'' were to be considered ''theories'', then, by the third law, employed ''methods'' would have to be deductive consequences of accepted m
    4 KB (625 words) - 05:53, 11 January 2018

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://www.scientowiki.com/Special:Search"