Search by property
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Workflow - Handling Ripple Effects + (The encyclopedia editors should be granted … The encyclopedia editors should be granted official housekeeping rights to handle the ripple effects. If the additional required changes are ''implicit'' in the suggested modification, the editors should create and alter encyclopedia pages to ensure that the accepted body of scientonomic knowledge is properly documented; if it is conceivable to accept the modification ''without'' accepting the ripple effect change in question, the editors should register these changes as new suggested modifications so that the community can discuss and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.s and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.)
- Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015) + (The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record + (The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.)
- The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for ''pursuitworthiness'' rather than ''acceptability''.)
- Workflow - Goals of Peer Review + (The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for ''pursuitworthiness'' rather than ''acceptability''.)
- Error Rejection by Replacement (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021) + (The handling of instances of scientific error is consistent with the theory rejection theorem; it involves a replacement of an erroneously accepted theory either with a first- or second-order proposition.)
- Mechanism of Error Rejection + (The handling of instances of scientific error is consistent with the theory rejection theorem; it involves a replacement of an erroneously accepted theory either with a first- or second-order proposition.)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 is not tautological.)
- Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 is not tautological.)
- The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (The law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 is not tautological.)
- Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015) + (The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment.)
- Individual Level + (The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment.)
- Social Level (Barseghyan-2015) + (The level of the scientific community and its mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods.)
- Social Level + (The level of the scientific community and its mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Methods - Employment (Barseghyan-2015) + (The list of possible stances towards a method is limited to ''employment''.)
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The method rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The necessary method theorem is a deductive consequence of the the second and third laws.)
- Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016) + (The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that employed methods don't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''.)
- The Paradox of Normative Propositions + (The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that employed methods don't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''.)
- Norm Rejection theorem (Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The norm rejection theorem suggested by Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Barseghyan-2015) + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''accept'', ''not accept'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Conclusive Theory Assessment + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (The process of method change is not necessarily deterministic: employed methods are by no means the only possible implementations of abstract requirements.)
- Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (The process of theory change is not necessarily deterministic: there may be cases when both a theory's acceptance and its unacceptance are equally possible.)
- Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan, Levesley, and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan and Levesley in 2021 is tautological.)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 is not tautological.)
- Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 is not tautological.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Definitions + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Pursuit and Acceptance + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Descriptive Theories + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018) + (The stance of [[Norm Employment|norm employment]] can be taken towards a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories + (The stance of [[Norm Employment|norm employment]] can be taken towards a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Methods + (The stance of [[Norm Employment|norm employment]] can be taken towards a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018) + (The stance of [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]] can be taken towards a [[Question|question]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions + (The stance of [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]] can be taken towards a [[Question|question]].)