Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Law" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]63 bytes (5 words) - 17:35, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]44 bytes (5 words) - 17:59, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]45 bytes (5 words) - 18:00, 7 December 2017
- |Last Name=Law307 bytes (49 words) - 16:50, 7 October 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]63 bytes (5 words) - 08:47, 2 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]42 bytes (5 words) - 18:01, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]44 bytes (5 words) - 06:01, 10 February 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]45 bytes (5 words) - 15:39, 30 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]42 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 30 September 2016
- |Title=The First Law |Alternate Titles=the law of scientific inertia4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
- |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=the law of theory acceptance9 KB (1,286 words) - 17:07, 27 January 2023
- |Title=The Third Law |Alternate Titles=the law of method employment18 KB (2,630 words) - 15:49, 4 February 2023
- |Title=The Third Law |Alternate Titles=the law of method employment8 KB (1,168 words) - 17:24, 7 May 2023
- |Title=The Zeroth Law |Alternate Titles=the law of compatibility21 KB (3,113 words) - 20:16, 10 February 2023
- #REDIRECT [[Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]86 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]69 bytes (8 words) - 22:33, 19 January 2023
- |Conclusion=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...rements".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129]] Thus, he argues, the second law is a mere explication of what is implicit in the definition of ''employed m752 bytes (102 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2023
- |Title=The First Law for Theories |Formulation File=The First Law for Theories Barseghyan 2015.jpg12 KB (1,712 words) - 17:12, 2 November 2023
- |Author=Michel Callon, Arie Rip, John Law,230 bytes (29 words) - 15:11, 29 March 2018
- |Title=The First Law for Methods |Formulation File=The First Law for Methods Barseghyan 2015.jpg4 KB (541 words) - 13:07, 19 January 2024
- |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=law of theory acceptance3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]66 bytes (8 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
- |Title=The First Law for Questions |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Questions644 bytes (82 words) - 19:36, 2 January 2024
- |Title=The Law of Norm Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png3 KB (408 words) - 11:14, 23 February 2024
- |Title=The First Law for Norms |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories634 bytes (83 words) - 19:43, 2 January 2024
- |Title=The Law of Method Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Method Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png1 KB (157 words) - 16:26, 30 October 2022
- |Title=The First Law for Theories |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Theories612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is Barseghyan's original second law a tautology?2 KB (228 words) - 22:37, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)]]80 bytes (8 words) - 21:02, 19 January 2023
- |Title=The Law of Compatibility |Formulation File=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png2 KB (330 words) - 20:54, 9 October 2021
- |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (247 words) - 22:32, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)2 KB (367 words) - 20:16, 3 January 2024
- |Title=The Law of Theory Demarcation ...ntific status of theories changes overtime. The assessment outcomes of the law (satisfied, unsatisfied, and inconclusive) are ''logically'' separated from1 KB (157 words) - 06:00, 3 March 2019
- |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Question=Is Harder's zeroth law a tautology?2 KB (214 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
- |Title=The Law of Question Acceptance |Formulation File=The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png609 bytes (80 words) - 23:39, 29 July 2021
- |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:21, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Question=Is the second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 a tautology?2 KB (250 words) - 23:02, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)1 KB (163 words) - 22:52, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?2 KB (219 words) - 20:49, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)664 bytes (87 words) - 20:22, 3 January 2024
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Ba118 bytes (9 words) - 21:58, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)668 bytes (87 words) - 20:25, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?2 KB (220 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) |Question=Is the first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Levesley in 2021 a tautology?2 KB (219 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)708 bytes (89 words) - 20:40, 3 January 2024
- #REDIRECT: [[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fras106 bytes (11 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]]88 bytes (10 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Question=Is the law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 a tautology?2 KB (240 words) - 19:27, 23 January 2023
- |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Question=Is the law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 a tautolog2 KB (253 words) - 23:19, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)700 bytes (89 words) - 20:50, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)688 bytes (89 words) - 20:34, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)1 KB (170 words) - 23:20, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)1 KB (164 words) - 23:12, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)4 KB (458 words) - 21:54, 19 January 2023
Page text matches
- ...e First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...is a deductive consequence of the first law, the second law, and the third law.1 KB (159 words) - 10:40, 17 January 2024
- |Title=The Law of Method Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Method Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png1 KB (157 words) - 16:26, 30 October 2022
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)664 bytes (87 words) - 20:22, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)668 bytes (87 words) - 20:25, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)700 bytes (89 words) - 20:50, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)688 bytes (89 words) - 20:34, 3 January 2024
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) ...plit'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law.1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)708 bytes (89 words) - 20:40, 3 January 2024
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...pty mosaic'' theorem follows deductively from the second law and the third law.946 bytes (129 words) - 10:46, 17 January 2024
- |Publisher=British Law: Constitutional Law: Special Topics284 bytes (39 words) - 21:52, 30 November 2017
- |Title=A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change ...s how the stance of compatibility obtains. Unlike the zeroth law, this new law has empirical content, as it forbids certain conceivable scenarios. Having1 KB (190 words) - 03:29, 22 March 2019
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)1 KB (170 words) - 23:20, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is Barseghyan's original second law a tautology?2 KB (228 words) - 22:37, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Question=Is Harder's zeroth law a tautology?2 KB (214 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Question=Is the second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 a tautology?2 KB (250 words) - 23:02, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)2 KB (367 words) - 20:16, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Question=Is the law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 a tautolog2 KB (253 words) - 23:19, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (247 words) - 22:32, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Question=Is the law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 a tautology?2 KB (240 words) - 19:27, 23 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)1 KB (163 words) - 22:52, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:21, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
- |Title=The First Law for Theories |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Theories612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...praisal theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law and the second law.1 KB (197 words) - 10:52, 17 January 2024
- |Title=The First Law for Questions |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Questions644 bytes (82 words) - 19:36, 2 January 2024
- |Conclusion=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...rements".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129]] Thus, he argues, the second law is a mere explication of what is implicit in the definition of ''employed m752 bytes (102 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2023
- |Title=The First Law for Norms |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories634 bytes (83 words) - 19:43, 2 January 2024
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?2 KB (219 words) - 20:49, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?2 KB (220 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
- ...bility sufficient to explain them? Do delayed rejections violate the First Law or the other laws?400 bytes (55 words) - 10:38, 9 November 2018
- |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) |Question=Is the first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Levesley in 2021 a tautology?2 KB (219 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)1 KB (164 words) - 23:12, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]45 bytes (5 words) - 15:39, 30 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]44 bytes (5 words) - 17:59, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]45 bytes (5 words) - 18:00, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]44 bytes (5 words) - 06:01, 10 February 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]42 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 30 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]42 bytes (5 words) - 18:01, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]63 bytes (5 words) - 08:47, 2 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]63 bytes (5 words) - 17:35, 7 December 2017
- * [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]] * [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]69 bytes (8 words) - 22:33, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]66 bytes (8 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT [[Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]86 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 19 January 2023
- |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...em is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.1 KB (145 words) - 11:05, 17 January 2024
- |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...em is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.1 KB (149 words) - 10:49, 17 January 2024
- |Title=Dilemma of the First Law ...t law is not a tautology, but these cases stand as violations of the first law. The paper resolves this dilemma by opting for the former option: cases of2 KB (311 words) - 17:50, 1 January 2024
- |Premises=Local Action Availability (Allen-2023), The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022) ...''local action availability'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the ''law of norm employment'' and the definition of ''local action availability''835 bytes (105 words) - 10:44, 17 January 2024
- |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=law of theory acceptance3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]]88 bytes (10 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
- ...all the theorems that were thought to be deducible by means of the zeroth law (e.g. [[Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)|the theory rejection the2 KB (226 words) - 17:06, 22 November 2021
- |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) ...ic would contain mutually incompatible elements, which is forbidden by the law of compatibility. Therefore, there is only one scenario when a theory can n2 KB (352 words) - 10:57, 17 January 2024
- ...from an empty set pose a problem for the current formulation of the third law? Can we conceive of a situation in which a method is derived from an empty ...nal scientonomists we would want to consider this a violation of the third law, but is this different than other potential violations?1 KB (167 words) - 20:27, 24 February 2023
- |Title=The Law of Question Acceptance |Formulation File=The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png609 bytes (80 words) - 23:39, 29 July 2021
- |Formulation Text=The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that empl # by [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the third law]], employed methods are deducible from accepted theories, including methodo2 KB (338 words) - 21:36, 14 March 2018
- |Title=The Law of Theory Demarcation ...ntific status of theories changes overtime. The assessment outcomes of the law (satisfied, unsatisfied, and inconclusive) are ''logically'' separated from1 KB (157 words) - 06:00, 3 March 2019
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...the third law). Indeed, if we recall the historical examples of the third law that we have discussed, we will see that new methods become employed when t2 KB (295 words) - 10:53, 17 January 2024
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...of the dictator or the ruling party. In short, it follows from the second law that sociocultural factors can affect a theory’s acceptance insofar as th2 KB (233 words) - 19:56, 23 November 2023
- |Title=Protomethod, The Third Law, and Ethical Propositions184 bytes (21 words) - 01:17, 11 March 2017
- |Title=The Law of Norm Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png3 KB (408 words) - 11:14, 23 February 2024
- |Title=Scientific Mosaics and the Law of Consistency173 bytes (21 words) - 02:01, 1 October 2016
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)]]80 bytes (8 words) - 21:02, 19 January 2023
- |Question=What does deducibility in the [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|the law of method employment]] mean? Does it refer to the deducibility of classic l |Description=The current formulation of the law of method employment asserts that a method becomes employed when it is dedu2 KB (293 words) - 02:47, 17 October 2022
- |Brief=a professor of law and philosophy at Yale University165 bytes (26 words) - 03:56, 19 December 2017
- |Premises=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...m is a deductive consequence of the method rejection theorem and the third law.1 KB (189 words) - 10:51, 17 January 2024
- #REDIRECT: [[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fras106 bytes (11 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
- |Title=Reformulating the Second Law ...he method employed at the time. We propose a new formulation of the second law: “If a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method actually em1 KB (211 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)855 bytes (115 words) - 10:43, 17 January 2024
- |Author=Michel Callon, Arie Rip, John Law,230 bytes (29 words) - 15:11, 29 March 2018
- |Description=The currently-accepted [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]] states that all elements of a mosaic must be compatible with each other. ...terms of compatibility for theories, even though the formulation of Zeroth Law might imply otherwise. This is further justified by the fact that which com1 KB (205 words) - 07:00, 7 March 2018
- ...ally employed at the time, and the [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|third law]], which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible f2 KB (252 words) - 18:46, 23 November 2023
- |Title=The First Law |Alternate Titles=the law of scientific inertia4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
- ...methods and [[Rory Harder|Harder]]'s [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|zeroth law]]. Barseghyan noted that this initial deduction was "similar to that of the ...s, the new method is in conflict with the old method. In this case, by the law of compatibility, the old method will have to go.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2014 KB (529 words) - 17:41, 24 February 2023
- |Title=The Law of Compatibility |Formulation File=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png2 KB (330 words) - 20:54, 9 October 2021
- ...is contradicted. Therefore, if the definition of theory acceptance and the law of demarcation criteria are accepted, then it must also be accepted that ac2 KB (225 words) - 16:07, 12 October 2020
- ...ere accepted methodologies and employed methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But ...f ''methodologies'' were to be considered ''theories'', then, by the third law, employed ''methods'' would have to be deductive consequences of accepted m4 KB (625 words) - 05:53, 11 January 2018
- ...description of the problem, we will review the main features of the zeroth law. In section three, we will briefly review some forms of pluralism to argue2 KB (294 words) - 22:25, 24 December 2021
- |Title=The Discovery of the Law of Conservation of Energy196 bytes (26 words) - 11:48, 5 October 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Ba118 bytes (9 words) - 21:58, 19 January 2023
- |Collection=Callon, Rip, and Law (Eds.) (1986)232 bytes (31 words) - 15:12, 29 March 2018
- |Title=Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation ...are to be traced and explained by scientonomy. Thus, we formulate a new ''law of theory demarcation'' to account for changes in scientificity within the1 KB (157 words) - 22:31, 23 February 2019
- ...=The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXI - Essays on Equality, Law, and Education313 bytes (47 words) - 15:10, 24 October 2017
- |Title=The First Law for Methods |Formulation File=The First Law for Methods Barseghyan 2015.jpg4 KB (541 words) - 13:07, 19 January 2024
- ...assumed by [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)|the second law]] of scientific change as formulated by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan i |Acceptance Indicators=The law became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modificat2 KB (248 words) - 20:47, 12 February 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)4 KB (458 words) - 21:54, 19 January 2023
- |Brief=an American philosopher of social science notable for his work on law-like explanations in the social sciences and his denial of a demarcation be295 bytes (46 words) - 21:15, 18 May 2019
- ...on of the paradox of normative propositions and reformulation of the third law328 bytes (47 words) - 03:09, 29 June 2017
- |Last Name=Law307 bytes (49 words) - 16:50, 7 October 2017
- ...'' and ''authority delegation'' as well as his reformulation of the second law335 bytes (52 words) - 04:56, 7 November 2017
- |Description=The [[The Third Law|third law]] allows for two distinct scenarios of method employment. A [[Method|method1 KB (186 words) - 15:49, 16 February 2017
- ...from [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]. By the second law, if a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method employed at th One thing to note within the second law is that acceptance could potentially occur if assessment is inconclusive. T2 KB (355 words) - 22:05, 12 June 2020
- ...f=a scientonomer who has done work on the tautological status of the first law and its corollaries359 bytes (56 words) - 21:36, 3 January 2024
- ...some of the current tenets of scientonomy, such as the [[The Third Law|the law of method employment]]. This raises a question: what minimal set of inferen1 KB (199 words) - 03:00, 17 October 2022
- ...obligatory/desirable/etc.”".[[CiteRef::Allen (2023)|p. 79]] Thus, from the law of norm employment, one can argue that:[[CiteRef::Allen (2023)|p. 81]] Thus, it follows from the law of norm employment that a local epistemic action becomes available to an ag2 KB (220 words) - 12:43, 16 January 2024
- ...ows from [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|former description of the third law]], which states that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible fr This description of the third law leaves room for methodologies’ to play an active role in scientific chang5 KB (761 words) - 21:41, 1 April 2018
- .... To deduce this theorem in the usual scientonomic fashion (from the first law and the compatibility corollary), we first ascertain that the notion of com2 KB (242 words) - 16:37, 1 August 2021
- ...n July 5, 1687. The Principia states Newton's three laws of motion and his law of universal gravitation. It is considered one of the most important works472 bytes (65 words) - 19:56, 5 December 2016
- |Title=The Third Law |Alternate Titles=the law of method employment8 KB (1,168 words) - 17:24, 7 May 2023
- ...onomic account of compatibility, [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|the zeroth law]], was proposed by [[Rory Harder]] in 2013. It was meant to address the iss ...came to be considered compatible.[[CiteRef::Fraser and Sarwar (2018)]] The law became accepted in 2021.5 KB (686 words) - 20:39, 26 February 2023