Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • |Question=Are all elements within a mosaic compatible with one another? ...le for two incompatible elements to be part of the same mosaic, or are the elements of any given mosaic always compatible with one another?
    767 bytes (107 words) - 19:29, 23 January 2023
  • |Formulation Text=A set of all epistemic elements accepted and/or employed by an epistemic agent. ...uture ontology of epistemic elements insofar as that ontology assumes that elements can be accepted and employed.
    2 KB (207 words) - 20:43, 10 February 2023
  • #REDIRECT [[Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements]]
    68 bytes (8 words) - 23:28, 21 February 2023
  • |Plural Capitalized=Epistemic Elements |Plural Lowercase=epistemic elements
    2 KB (272 words) - 16:59, 26 January 2023
  • ...hat is the relationship between questions and the other types of epistemic elements? More specifically, what is the relationship between question acceptance an
    567 bytes (78 words) - 23:02, 19 October 2019
  • #REDIRECT: [[Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements]]
    59 bytes (6 words) - 18:56, 23 January 2023
  • ...n of a scientific mosaic or to identify the [[Necessary Elements|necessary elements]] of such an original mosaic? Can the existing laws and theorems shed light ...pics=Scope of Scientonomy - Time Fields and Scale, Mosaic Split, Necessary Elements,
    1 KB (179 words) - 17:22, 8 February 2018
  • ...e of questions into scientonomic ontology as a separate class of epistemic elements suggests a new avenue of research into the mechanism of question acceptance
    2 KB (295 words) - 00:10, 13 May 2018
  • |Description=Are epistemic elements part of the process of scientific change? ...ce of many of its subquestions, such as the question of types of epistemic elements, types of theories, etc.
    867 bytes (118 words) - 16:33, 21 December 2022
  • ...mic elements, with reason, based on a semantic understanding of the elements and their available alternatives, and with the goal of producing knowledge"
    1 KB (130 words) - 16:14, 9 February 2023
  • ...hyan (2015)]] It remained part of several accepted ontologies of epistemic elements that followed, including that of [[William Rawleigh|Rawleigh]][[CiteRef::Ra
    2 KB (199 words) - 18:25, 29 December 2022
  • ...becomes employed only if it is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the mosaic. ...ions into the epistemic elements of the ontology of scientific change, the elements of the mosaic are now more expansive than just theories and subtypes of the
    3 KB (408 words) - 11:14, 23 February 2024
  • ...lation Text=An agent capable of taking epistemic stances towards epistemic elements. ...gent amount to taking [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stances]] towards these elements, such as accepting or pursuing a theory, accepting a question, or employing
    2 KB (217 words) - 16:52, 21 February 2023
  • |Formulation Text=A model of all epistemic elements accepted or employed by the epistemic agent. ...ing “set of all epistemic elements” with a semantic “model of all accepted elements”.[[CiteRef::Rawleigh (2022)|p. 91]] The definition considers a scientific
    923 bytes (117 words) - 15:33, 30 October 2022
  • ...y must identify and describe which factors allow a community to modify any elements within their mosaic.
    1 KB (144 words) - 16:55, 16 February 2017
  • ...compatibility is distinct from [[Theory Acceptance|acceptance]], since two elements need not be in the same mosaic, or even accepted by any agent to be conside
    2 KB (293 words) - 22:06, 27 February 2023
  • ...becomes employed only if it is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the mosaic. ...ll other types, methods become employed when they are derivable from other elements of the agent's mosaic (such as other theories, other methods, and perhaps e
    1 KB (157 words) - 16:26, 30 October 2022
  • |Formulation Text=The ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic. ...ry Harder|Harder]] and [[Hakob Barseghyan|Barseghyan]] - the idea that two elements are compatible when they can coexist within the same mosaic.
    1 KB (148 words) - 03:02, 4 June 2020
  • |Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements ...that, as an epistemic stance, compatibility can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types.[[CiteRef::Fraser and Sarwar (2018)|p. 70]]
    1 KB (153 words) - 19:43, 26 January 2023
  • |Formulation Text=If a pair of elements satisfies the compatibility criteria employed at the time, it becomes compa ...18)|p. 73]] Accordingly, the law of compatibility states that if a pair of elements does satisfy the compatibility criteria of the time, then it is deemed as c
    2 KB (330 words) - 20:54, 9 October 2021
  • |Formulation Text=Criteria for determining whether two elements are compatible or incompatible. ...ission, Fraser and Sarwar "suggest that the word ‘theories’ be changed to ‘elements’ to account for the fact that the compatibility criteria apply to theorie
    3 KB (442 words) - 15:41, 12 October 2020
  • ...on Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018)|subtypes of epistemic elements]], alongside [[Theory|theories]] and [[Method|methods]]. This, along with t ...he Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|mechanism for methods]] to explain how those elements become part of a mosaic. Given that a mechanism for theories and methods ex
    2 KB (322 words) - 19:38, 10 February 2023
  • ...f=a Canadian scientonomist, notable for his work on questions as epistemic elements and the mechanism of method employment
    388 bytes (57 words) - 14:39, 11 February 2023
  • ...of scientific change needs to establish a basic ''ontology'' of epistemic elements that are part of the process of scientific change. ...ve, with the concept of ''disciplinary matrices'', defined as those shared elements that account for the relatively unproblematic professional communication an
    7 KB (1,005 words) - 22:02, 27 February 2023
  • ...es=Surely we have an accepted answer to this. We customarily talk of tacit elements. |Lower Order Elements=
    1 KB (203 words) - 16:15, 21 February 2023
  • ...ox by Sebastien, it became possible to introduce normative propositions as elements of the ontology of scientific change.
    2 KB (198 words) - 00:33, 11 February 2023
  • ...ly establish a systematic philosophy of "pragmatic idealism" that combines elements of the European continental idealism with American pragmatism
    425 bytes (59 words) - 16:38, 25 October 2019
  • ...d methods shape theory construction? In addition, it seems as though other elements of the mosaic play a part in shaping theory construction. For example, the |Lower Order Elements=
    1 KB (209 words) - 03:13, 17 October 2022
  • ...permissibility/desirability is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the agent’s mosaic. ...permissibility/desirability is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the agent’s mosaic.
    2 KB (220 words) - 12:43, 16 January 2024
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    2 KB (228 words) - 17:10, 22 January 2023
  • ...all standard relations between temporal entities. It also shows how these elements can be combined to produce complex timelines. Some possible future directio
    2 KB (210 words) - 16:27, 21 September 2021
  • ...nition, as they are not necessarily aiming to generate or assess epistemic elements. Yet, actions of publishing textbooks or spreading knowledge more generally
    2 KB (366 words) - 11:26, 16 January 2024
  • ...y there. Thus, the question is what it is that makes a mosaic preserve its elements through time and under which conditions exactly this inertia ends.
    2 KB (229 words) - 23:24, 21 February 2023
  • |Formulation Text=At any moment of time, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other. |Topic=Compatibility of Mosaic Elements
    2 KB (226 words) - 17:06, 22 November 2021
  • |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements ...xt=An element of the mosaic remains in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.
    4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
  • ...dled. Specifically, should the editors be granted a permission to make the necessary adjustments for the sake of maintaining consistency, without the need for e
    3 KB (387 words) - 19:22, 5 March 2023
  • |Formulation Text=A question becomes rejected when other elements that are incompatible with the question become accepted.
    567 bytes (69 words) - 21:10, 30 July 2021
  • ...s> that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What <subjects>, if any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    3 KB (386 words) - 22:21, 21 January 2023
  • |Formulation Text=A norm becomes rejected when other elements that are incompatible with the norm become part of the mosaic.
    562 bytes (72 words) - 23:20, 2 January 2024
  • |Acceptance Indicators=The existence of epistemic elements has been tacitly accepted since the inception of scientonomy.
    645 bytes (80 words) - 20:33, 17 December 2022
  • |Formulation Text=A question becomes rejected when other elements that are incompatible with the question become part of the mosaic.
    618 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 2 January 2024
  • ...compatibility, he did it by answering the question of whether two or more elements can coexist in the same mosaic. He said that they can. However, this answer
    2 KB (294 words) - 22:25, 24 December 2021
  • ...or may not be tightly adjusted; there may be considerable gaps between the elements of the mosaic. For instance, nowadays we realize that there is a considerab
    2 KB (270 words) - 20:37, 3 February 2023
  • those elements of it (the observational elements) that can be shown to be true (or in
    2 KB (278 words) - 17:07, 30 December 2020
  • ...mes rejected, for otherwise the mosaic would contain mutually incompatible elements, which is forbidden by the law of compatibility. Therefore, there is only o
    2 KB (352 words) - 10:57, 17 January 2024
  • ...An accepted theory remains accepted in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.
    612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
  • ...ce on the syntactic surface of a sentence. The linearization of linguistic elements is manifest at the derivational point of Spell-out and also on the level of
    2 KB (315 words) - 03:24, 2 August 2021
  • ...accepted question remains accepted in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.
    644 bytes (82 words) - 19:36, 2 January 2024
  • |Lower Order Elements=
    764 bytes (101 words) - 16:50, 9 February 2023
  • ...t=An employed norm remains employed in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.
    634 bytes (83 words) - 19:43, 2 January 2024
  • ...f the process of scientific change, as they take stances towards epistemic elements.
    816 bytes (105 words) - 15:50, 9 February 2023
  • |Question=Under what conditions can two elements ''coexist'' in the same mosaic? ...rseghyan (2015)|pp. 159-161]] What conditions allow for the coexistence of elements, and what conditions require modification or rejection to take place?
    5 KB (686 words) - 20:39, 26 February 2023
  • |Question=Is it the case that changes in one of the elements of a mosaic can have a "ripple effect" on the rest of the mosaic? ...tion=As an element of a mosaic undergoes modification, it seems that other elements that are dependent on this element can also undergo change. For instance, t
    2 KB (353 words) - 01:33, 3 September 2019
  • ...e fixed. The idea that methods should be included as historically relative elements within a community’s system of beliefs is known as [[Static and Dynamic M ...Barseghyan-2015)|methods]] are the only two fundamental types of epistemic elements.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]][[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]]
    6 KB (799 words) - 19:20, 10 February 2023
  • ...Epistemic Stance|epistemic stances]] towards [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]].[[CiteRef::Patton (2019)]]
    951 bytes (118 words) - 17:03, 9 February 2023
  • ...eir employed method. This question seeks to describe what happens to other elements in the mosaic when a community undergoes such a change.
    1,000 bytes (135 words) - 20:46, 26 February 2023
  • ...s, i.e. changes in stances that epistemic agents take towards to epistemic elements. The question is whether these laws apply to changes in belief systems of '
    869 bytes (120 words) - 21:32, 1 February 2020
  • ...tance of [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0002|Rawleigh's ontology of epistemic elements]].
    979 bytes (119 words) - 16:01, 28 December 2022
  • ...it must be clarified which types of stances can be taken towards epistemic elements of any given type. ...'' types; the stances that can be taken toward specific types of epistemic elements (e.g. towards [[Theory|theories]], [[Question|questions]], [[Method|methods
    5 KB (671 words) - 17:12, 27 February 2023
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements ...not'' include the more general stances that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types, but only those that can be taken towards theories.
    3 KB (437 words) - 20:19, 23 January 2023
  • ...implicit, and thus merge what was previously separated into two classes of elements - [[Method (Barseghyan-2015)|methods]] and [[Methodology (Sebastien-2016)|m
    1 KB (132 words) - 00:12, 3 September 2019
  • ...synonyms. In the scientonomic context, theories are considered fundamental elements of a mosaic. This leaves the question of the status of models in a mosaic.
    1 KB (157 words) - 16:21, 21 February 2023
  • ...the end of the 17th century many of its key elements were replaced by new elements. Finally, by circa 1700 the Aristotelian-medieval system of theories was re
    3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
  • ...ts'', taking different epistemic ''stances'' towards different epistemic ''elements''. For instance, we can say that the Paris community of 1720 [[Theory Accep * What types of [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]] can there be in the process of scientific change? I.e. are there theories
    8 KB (1,169 words) - 11:25, 13 February 2024
  • ...rested in both explicit and implicit elements and stances, is it important/necessary to trace this difference? What are the practical considerations for and aga
    1 KB (149 words) - 21:31, 16 October 2022
  • |Question=Are [[Definition|definitions]] somehow reducible to other epistemic elements, such as [[Descriptive Theory|descriptive]] or [[Normative Theory|normative
    1 KB (144 words) - 16:36, 21 February 2023
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    1 KB (160 words) - 15:43, 23 January 2023
  • |Conclusion=Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Title=Deduction of the Necessary Mosaic Split Theorem
    1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
  • ...mpatibility'' is an independent stance that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types. We then provide a new definition of ''compatibility criteria'
    1 KB (190 words) - 03:29, 22 March 2019
  • ...tibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)|the compatibility corollary]], the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other at any moment of ti
    1 KB (145 words) - 11:05, 17 January 2024
  • ...tibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)|the compatibility corollary]], the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other at any moment of ti
    1 KB (149 words) - 10:49, 17 January 2024
  • ...i.e. what happens at the level of individual [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]] when an agent accepts a discipline.
    1 KB (169 words) - 16:53, 21 February 2023
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    1 KB (200 words) - 20:02, 10 February 2023
  • ...ics [...] Therefore, in order for the two mosaics to merge into one, these elements should either be rejected in both or accepted in both, so that the differen
    5 KB (737 words) - 22:07, 10 November 2023
  • ...nvolved. Additionally, there is a distinct lack of historical evidence for necessary mosaic splits. |Lower Order Elements=
    1 KB (183 words) - 13:59, 29 December 2022
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (210 words) - 20:32, 23 January 2023
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (215 words) - 20:55, 10 February 2023
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    1 KB (190 words) - 17:15, 22 January 2023
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (212 words) - 22:17, 19 February 2023
  • ...s conception of meaning onto Popper's falsificationist philosophy. The key elements of Feyerabend's model of the acquisition of knowledge are identified and cr
    1 KB (188 words) - 02:36, 29 August 2017
  • |Inherited From=Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (215 words) - 16:40, 21 February 2023
  • ...ently-accepted [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]] states that all elements of a mosaic must be compatible with each other. However, it is not clear wh
    1 KB (205 words) - 07:00, 7 March 2018
  • ...how radical conceptual change occurs during a scientific revolution. When elements of a theory that are considered to be a priori or constitutive change, we h
    1 KB (200 words) - 22:28, 24 December 2021
  • |Inherited From=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements
    1 KB (192 words) - 14:54, 4 October 2023
  • ...at all, determine whether a program is degenerating or progressive, it is necessary that its theories be subjected to Lakatos’ criteria of theory choice. In ...ion, and consistency. [[CiteRef::Motterlini (Ed.) (1999)|p. 9]] These four elements in every case, when applied to history, implied no scientific progress. As
    4 KB (581 words) - 22:44, 5 February 2018
  • |Formulation Text=A theory becomes rejected when other elements that are incompatible with the theory become part of the mosaic. ...ory]] becomes '''rejected''' only when other [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]] that are incompatible with the theory become accepted. This formulation d
    8 KB (1,213 words) - 23:13, 2 January 2024
  • |Parent Topic=Necessary Theories |Lower Order Elements=
    1 KB (199 words) - 03:00, 17 October 2022
  • |Lower Order Elements=
    1 KB (217 words) - 14:13, 29 December 2022
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    2 KB (216 words) - 17:37, 22 January 2023
  • ...Epistemic Stance|epistemic stances]] towards [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]]
    2 KB (227 words) - 20:32, 2 March 2023
  • ...only when its permissibility is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the agent’s mosaic, i.e., from that agent’s employed norms and accep
    2 KB (244 words) - 18:22, 1 January 2024
  • ...by positing laws that describe transitions in science and its constituent elements. ...scientific change that governs the changes in theories, methods and other elements of science.
    5 KB (687 words) - 07:15, 7 December 2018
  • |Inherited From=Necessary Epistemic Elements |Question Title Formula=Necessary <Subjects>
    2 KB (216 words) - 17:25, 22 January 2023
  • |Inherited From=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (214 words) - 23:32, 21 February 2023
  • ..., I suggest that the “scientific mosaic” should include a diverse array of elements and consider other aspects of methodology in addition to theory-assessment.
    2 KB (226 words) - 22:07, 24 December 2021
  • ...ection theorem'', which states that a question becomes rejected when other elements that are incompatible with the question become accepted. To deduce this the
    2 KB (242 words) - 16:37, 1 August 2021
  • ...ods but to norms of all types, as is the case in the ontology of epistemic elements suggested by [[Hakob Barseghyan|Barseghyan]] in 2018. According to that ont
    2 KB (213 words) - 20:58, 10 February 2023
  • ...tics, physics, optics, and astronomy. At 23 he had already established the elements of differential calculus. Soon after he created the reflecting telescope an
    1 KB (229 words) - 13:56, 12 February 2017
  • |Inherited From=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements
    2 KB (214 words) - 19:38, 2 January 2024
  • ...the higher-level system. For example, in Biology, the study of lower level elements like genes does not imply that a theory at a higher level is not possible:
    5 KB (710 words) - 00:14, 5 December 2018

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)