Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Create the page "Law" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) is Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)
    1 KB (163 words) - 22:52, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
    2 KB (264 words) - 20:21, 3 January 2024
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
    2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
  • The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Title=The First Law for Theories |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Theories
    612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
  • Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...praisal theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law and the second law.
    1 KB (197 words) - 10:52, 17 January 2024
  • The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
    |Title=The First Law for Questions |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Questions
    644 bytes (82 words) - 19:36, 2 January 2024
  • The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Conclusion=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...rements".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129]] Thus, he argues, the second law is a mere explication of what is implicit in the definition of ''employed m
    752 bytes (102 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2023
  • The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Title=The First Law for Norms |Alternate Titles=The Law of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories
    634 bytes (83 words) - 19:43, 2 January 2024
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?
    2 KB (219 words) - 20:49, 3 January 2024
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?
    2 KB (220 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
  • Application of Scientonomy to Delayed Rejection
    ...bility sufficient to explain them? Do delayed rejections violate the First Law or the other laws?
    400 bytes (55 words) - 10:38, 9 November 2018
  • Tautological Status of The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) |Question=Is the first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Levesley in 2021 a tautology?
    2 KB (219 words) - 20:38, 3 January 2024
  • The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    1 KB (164 words) - 23:12, 19 January 2023
  • The First Law
    #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    45 bytes (5 words) - 15:39, 30 September 2016
  • Third Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]
    44 bytes (5 words) - 17:59, 7 December 2017
  • First Law
    #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    45 bytes (5 words) - 18:00, 7 December 2017
  • The Third Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]
    44 bytes (5 words) - 06:01, 10 February 2017
  • The Zeroth Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]
    42 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 30 September 2016
  • Zeroth Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]
    42 bytes (5 words) - 18:01, 7 December 2017
  • The Second Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
    63 bytes (5 words) - 08:47, 2 December 2017
  • Second Law
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
    63 bytes (5 words) - 17:35, 7 December 2017
  • The Theory of Scientific Change
    * [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]] * [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    3 KB (305 words) - 21:48, 19 February 2023
  • Tautological Status of the First Law
    #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    69 bytes (8 words) - 22:33, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of the Zeroth Law
    #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]
    66 bytes (8 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
  • Tautological Status of the Second Law
    #REDIRECT [[Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
    86 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 19 January 2023
  • Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...em is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.
    1 KB (145 words) - 11:05, 17 January 2024
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...em is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.
    1 KB (149 words) - 10:49, 17 January 2024
  • Pandey (2023)
    |Title=Dilemma of the First Law ...t law is not a tautology, but these cases stand as violations of the first law. The paper resolves this dilemma by opting for the former option: cases of
    2 KB (311 words) - 17:50, 1 January 2024
  • Local Action Availability theorem (Allen-2023) Reason1
    |Premises=Local Action Availability (Allen-2023), The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022) ...''local action availability'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the ''law of norm employment'' and the definition of ''local action availability''
    835 bytes (105 words) - 10:44, 17 January 2024
  • The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=law of theory acceptance
    3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
  • Tautological Status of the Law of Theory Demarcation
    #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
  • Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    ...all the theorems that were thought to be deducible by means of the zeroth law (e.g. [[Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)|the theory rejection the
    2 KB (226 words) - 17:06, 22 November 2021
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason2
    |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) ...ic would contain mutually incompatible elements, which is forbidden by the law of compatibility. Therefore, there is only one scenario when a theory can n
    2 KB (352 words) - 10:57, 17 January 2024
  • Deriving Methods from an Empty Set
    ...from an empty set pose a problem for the current formulation of the third law? Can we conceive of a situation in which a method is derived from an empty ...nal scientonomists we would want to consider this a violation of the third law, but is this different than other potential violations?
    1 KB (167 words) - 20:27, 24 February 2023
  • The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
    |Title=The Law of Question Acceptance |Formulation File=The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png
    609 bytes (80 words) - 23:39, 29 July 2021
  • Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016)
    |Formulation Text=The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that empl # by [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the third law]], employed methods are deducible from accepted theories, including methodo
    2 KB (338 words) - 21:36, 14 March 2018
  • The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    |Title=The Law of Theory Demarcation ...ntific status of theories changes overtime. The assessment outcomes of the law (satisfied, unsatisfied, and inconclusive) are ''logically'' separated from
    1 KB (157 words) - 06:00, 3 March 2019
  • Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...the third law). Indeed, if we recall the historical examples of the third law that we have discussed, we will see that new methods become employed when t
    2 KB (295 words) - 10:53, 17 January 2024
  • Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...of the dictator or the ruling party. In short, it follows from the second law that sociocultural factors can affect a theory’s acceptance insofar as th
    2 KB (233 words) - 19:56, 23 November 2023
  • Burkholder (2014)
    |Title=Protomethod, The Third Law, and Ethical Propositions
    184 bytes (21 words) - 01:17, 11 March 2017
  • The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022)
    |Title=The Law of Norm Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png
    3 KB (408 words) - 11:14, 23 February 2024
  • Harder (2013)
    |Title=Scientific Mosaics and the Law of Consistency
    173 bytes (21 words) - 02:01, 1 October 2016
  • The Second Law is a Tautology (Barseghyan-2015)
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)]]
    80 bytes (8 words) - 21:02, 19 January 2023
  • Deducibility in Method Employment
    |Question=What does deducibility in the [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|the law of method employment]] mean? Does it refer to the deducibility of classic l |Description=The current formulation of the law of method employment asserts that a method becomes employed when it is dedu
    2 KB (293 words) - 02:47, 17 October 2022
  • Gideon Yaffe
    |Brief=a professor of law and philosophy at Yale University
    165 bytes (26 words) - 03:56, 19 December 2017
  • Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...m is a deductive consequence of the method rejection theorem and the third law.
    1 KB (189 words) - 10:51, 17 January 2024
  • The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
    #REDIRECT: [[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fras
    106 bytes (11 words) - 23:22, 19 January 2023
  • Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)
    |Title=Reformulating the Second Law ...he method employed at the time. We propose a new formulation of the second law: “If a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method actually em
    1 KB (211 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
  • Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1
    |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)
    855 bytes (115 words) - 10:43, 17 January 2024
  • Callon, Rip, and Law (Eds.) (1986)
    |Author=Michel Callon, Arie Rip, John Law,
    230 bytes (29 words) - 15:11, 29 March 2018
  • Theory vs. Method Compatibility
    |Description=The currently-accepted [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]] states that all elements of a mosaic must be compatible with each other. ...terms of compatibility for theories, even though the formulation of Zeroth Law might imply otherwise. This is further justified by the fact that which com
    1 KB (205 words) - 07:00, 7 March 2018
  • Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...ally employed at the time, and the [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|third law]], which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible f
    2 KB (252 words) - 18:46, 23 November 2023
  • The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Title=The First Law |Alternate Titles=the law of scientific inertia
    4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
  • Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...methods and [[Rory Harder|Harder]]'s [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|zeroth law]]. Barseghyan noted that this initial deduction was "similar to that of the ...s, the new method is in conflict with the old method. In this case, by the law of compatibility, the old method will have to go.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (201
    4 KB (529 words) - 17:41, 24 February 2023
  • The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    |Title=The Law of Compatibility |Formulation File=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png
    2 KB (330 words) - 20:54, 9 October 2021
  • Demarcation-Acceptance Synchronism (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
    ...is contradicted. Therefore, if the definition of theory acceptance and the law of demarcation criteria are accepted, then it must also be accepted that ac
    2 KB (225 words) - 16:07, 12 October 2020
  • The Paradox of Normative Propositions
    ...ere accepted methodologies and employed methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But ...f ''methodologies'' were to be considered ''theories'', then, by the third law, employed ''methods'' would have to be deductive consequences of accepted m
    4 KB (625 words) - 05:53, 11 January 2018
  • Garcia (2022)
    ...description of the problem, we will review the main features of the zeroth law. In section three, we will briefly review some forms of pluralism to argue
    2 KB (294 words) - 22:25, 24 December 2021
  • Sarton (1929)
    |Title=The Discovery of the Law of Conservation of Energy
    196 bytes (26 words) - 11:48, 5 October 2017
  • The Second Law is Not a Tautology (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Ba
    118 bytes (9 words) - 21:58, 19 January 2023
  • Latour and Bastide (1986)
    |Collection=Callon, Rip, and Law (Eds.) (1986)
    232 bytes (31 words) - 15:12, 29 March 2018
  • Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
    |Title=Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation ...are to be traced and explained by scientonomy. Thus, we formulate a new ''law of theory demarcation'' to account for changes in scientificity within the
    1 KB (157 words) - 22:31, 23 February 2019
  • Mill (1984)
    ...=The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXI - Essays on Equality, Law, and Education
    313 bytes (47 words) - 15:10, 24 October 2017
  • The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Title=The First Law for Methods |Formulation File=The First Law for Methods Barseghyan 2015.jpg
    4 KB (541 words) - 13:07, 19 January 2024
  • Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    ...assumed by [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)|the second law]] of scientific change as formulated by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan i |Acceptance Indicators=The law became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modificat
    2 KB (248 words) - 20:47, 12 February 2023
  • The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
    4 KB (458 words) - 21:54, 19 January 2023
  • Lee McIntyre
    |Brief=an American philosopher of social science notable for his work on law-like explanations in the social sciences and his denial of a demarcation be
    295 bytes (46 words) - 21:15, 18 May 2019
  • Zoe Sebastien
    ...on of the paradox of normative propositions and reformulation of the third law
    328 bytes (47 words) - 03:09, 29 June 2017
  • John Law
    |Last Name=Law
    307 bytes (49 words) - 16:50, 7 October 2017
  • Nicholas Overgaard
    ...'' and ''authority delegation'' as well as his reformulation of the second law
    335 bytes (52 words) - 04:56, 7 November 2017
  • Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Description=The [[The Third Law|third law]] allows for two distinct scenarios of method employment. A [[Method|method
    1 KB (186 words) - 15:49, 16 February 2017
  • Sufficient Reason theorem (Palider-2019)
    ...from [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]. By the second law, if a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method employed at th One thing to note within the second law is that acceptance could potentially occur if assessment is inconclusive. T
    2 KB (355 words) - 22:05, 12 June 2020
  • Aayu Pandey
    ...f=a scientonomer who has done work on the tautological status of the first law and its corollaries
    359 bytes (56 words) - 21:36, 3 January 2024
  • Necessary Logic
    ...some of the current tenets of scientonomy, such as the [[The Third Law|the law of method employment]]. This raises a question: what minimal set of inferen
    1 KB (199 words) - 03:00, 17 October 2022
  • Local Action Availability theorem (Allen-2023)
    ...obligatory/desirable/etc.”".[[CiteRef::Allen (2023)|p. 79]] Thus, from the law of norm employment, one can argue that:[[CiteRef::Allen (2023)|p. 81]] Thus, it follows from the law of norm employment that a local epistemic action becomes available to an ag
    2 KB (220 words) - 12:43, 16 January 2024
  • Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...ows from [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|former description of the third law]], which states that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible fr This description of the third law leaves room for methodologies’ to play an active role in scientific chang
    5 KB (761 words) - 21:41, 1 April 2018
  • Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)
    .... To deduce this theorem in the usual scientonomic fashion (from the first law and the compatibility corollary), we first ascertain that the notion of com
    2 KB (242 words) - 16:37, 1 August 2021
  • Newton (1687)
    ...n July 5, 1687. The Principia states Newton's three laws of motion and his law of universal gravitation. It is considered one of the most important works
    472 bytes (65 words) - 19:56, 5 December 2016
  • The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
    |Title=The Third Law |Alternate Titles=the law of method employment
    8 KB (1,168 words) - 17:24, 7 May 2023
  • Mechanism of Compatibility
    ...onomic account of compatibility, [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|the zeroth law]], was proposed by [[Rory Harder]] in 2013. It was meant to address the iss ...came to be considered compatible.[[CiteRef::Fraser and Sarwar (2018)]] The law became accepted in 2021.
    5 KB (686 words) - 20:39, 26 February 2023
  • The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)
    |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=the law of theory acceptance
    9 KB (1,286 words) - 17:07, 27 January 2023
  • Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...e. Since the theories are incompatible, under the [[The Zeroth Law|zeroth law]], they cannot be accepted into the same mosaic, and a mosaic split must th ...e exactly one of the theories being assessed. By the [[The Third Law|third law]], each mosaic will also have a distinct method that precludes the acceptan
    6 KB (876 words) - 20:12, 6 November 2023
  • Michael Martin
    ...he philosophy of religion, and also worked in the philosophies of science, law, and social science.
    406 bytes (64 words) - 04:11, 16 November 2017
  • Mechanism of Method Employment
    ...stien]]. Sebastien's [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|reformulation of the law]] made it explicit that an employed method need not necessarily follow from |Related Theories=The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016),
    5 KB (708 words) - 11:32, 14 February 2024
  • Sebastien (2016)
    ...ssible in cases where methodologies and methods conflict. Under the zeroth law, all elements in the scientific mosaic are compatible with one another. But
    2 KB (282 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
  • Methodology and Methods
    ...equirements of some other employed method, a seeming problem for the Third Law.
    4 KB (504 words) - 04:34, 11 January 2018
  • Feyerabend (1973)
    ...planned for 20 March 1973, where he was to criticize Lakatos's defense of "Law and Order" from an anarchist point of view. The theses were enclosed with a
    536 bytes (75 words) - 21:30, 14 June 2017
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)
    ...dey provides several examples of this phenomenon in ''Dilemma of The First Law''.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]] ...that the theory rejection theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law for theories and the compatibility corollary.[[CiteRef::Fraser and Sarwar (
    8 KB (1,213 words) - 23:13, 2 January 2024
  • Paul Patton
    ...he Encyclopedia of Scientonomy notable for his reformulation of the second law of scientific change, his work on disciplines, epistemic agents and tools,
    547 bytes (82 words) - 18:28, 21 September 2021
  • Norm Rejection theorem (Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Description=Pandey makes a case that the first law and all of its corollaries are tautological.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]]
    640 bytes (80 words) - 21:22, 3 January 2024
  • Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Description=Pandey makes a case that the first law and all of its corollaries are tautological.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]]
    651 bytes (79 words) - 21:18, 3 January 2024
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Description=Pandey makes a case that the first law and all of its corollaries are tautological.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]]
    664 bytes (80 words) - 21:17, 3 January 2024
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
    ...that the theory rejection theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law for theories and the compatibility corollary.[[CiteRef::Fraser and Sarwar ( ...greater than the resistance of the medium. In that case, according to the law, the velocity will be proportional to the force and inversely proportional
    8 KB (1,153 words) - 16:47, 24 February 2023
  • Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Description=Pandey makes a case that the first law and all of its corollaries are tautological.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]]
    696 bytes (82 words) - 21:27, 3 January 2024
  • Mechanism of Question Acceptance
    ...aard-Barseghyan-2017)|mechanism for theories]] and an accepted [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)|mechanism for methods]] to explain how those elements beco
    2 KB (322 words) - 19:38, 10 February 2023
  • Mechanism of Theory Acceptance
    ...tance. Secondly, the law sounded like a tautology which is not what a good law should sound like.[[CiteRef::Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)]] ...iteRef::Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)]] The reformulated second law also clearly indicated the possibility of [[Theory Assessment Outcomes (Pat
    7 KB (906 words) - 11:22, 14 February 2024
  • Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Description=Pandey makes a case that the first law and all of its corollaries are tautological.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]]
    742 bytes (83 words) - 21:34, 3 January 2024
  • Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
    |Description=Pandey makes a case that the first law and all of its corollaries are tautological.[[CiteRef::Pandey (2023)]]
    712 bytes (82 words) - 21:16, 3 January 2024
  • Westfall (1980)
    ...s, and especially the investigations in celestial dynamics that led to the law of universal gravitation.
    822 bytes (119 words) - 19:22, 2 February 2017
  • Conclusive Theory Assessment
    |Description=[[The Second Law|The second law]] specifies that, in order to become accepted, a theory is assessed by the ...osed a modified [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)|Second Law]] of Scientific Change that they feel better accommodates the possibility o
    5 KB (645 words) - 12:16, 1 November 2022

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://www.scientowiki.com/Special:Search"